Robert
Reverse Engineer
As everyone is aware by now, through-hole J201s are obsolete and obviously aren't making a comeback. It seems like even the dark corners of the net have run dry.
In the past, when possible, I have tried to include both through-hole and SMD pads for designs that require J201, 2N5457, 2N5485, etc... Some designs are simply too complex to allow this while keeping the board within reasonable dimensions. (or it just looks plain messy)
The majority of the issues reported here with builds involving through-hole J201s has ended up being fake/poor spec transistors, so most are resorting to SMD transistors with a SOT23 adapter board.
This brings me to my question...
From this point forward, when a design doesn't lend itself to "both", should we just omit the through-hole pads and go with SMD pads for the hard-to-find JFETs?
If everyone is using an adapter board anyway, it seems silly to keep beating a dead horse.
In the past, when possible, I have tried to include both through-hole and SMD pads for designs that require J201, 2N5457, 2N5485, etc... Some designs are simply too complex to allow this while keeping the board within reasonable dimensions. (or it just looks plain messy)
The majority of the issues reported here with builds involving through-hole J201s has ended up being fake/poor spec transistors, so most are resorting to SMD transistors with a SOT23 adapter board.
This brings me to my question...
From this point forward, when a design doesn't lend itself to "both", should we just omit the through-hole pads and go with SMD pads for the hard-to-find JFETs?
If everyone is using an adapter board anyway, it seems silly to keep beating a dead horse.