Two articles are in contradiction about the BD-2 tonestack, which one is right ?

eh là bas ma

Well-known member
I remembered reading about this integrated BD-2 project, and in this he says the tonestack being max bass and mids, minimum treble.

In this website, if you set it as such you can see a similar curve as in the blue pilot post.
 
The plot in yellow is the Fender tone stack with the controls dimed
Looks like the yellow curve is the closer one to the BD-2 red curve. What values are these ? What do you mean by dimed ? Even the Bass knob is "dimed" ?

Are you in contradiction with Chuck D. Bones, Analogisnotdead and B. Wampler ?
 
This is getting even more confusing : Chuck analysis is in contradiction with both articles :



I still wonder who is right ? Brian Wampler, Analogisnotdead, or Chuck D. Bones ?

well the "mid capacitor" c3 on the website posted above isn't grounded out, so it can't be set to minimum so I would argue it depends on what size mid pot you have. The BD-2 uses a 15k resistor here, which is bigger than a 10k pot as shown in the website example TMB fender stack, but if its a 25k mid pot like in a 5f6 bassman then 15k/25k is 0.6 so I'd say it depends on which TMB tonestack you're looking at.
 
the treble pot in the fender tone stack is a voltage divider between signal and ground. in the bd-2 that voltage divider is 330K series resistance to the signal and 0R to ground. Both the Bass and Mid controls are variable resistors rather than voltage dividers. Consult the Fender AB763 layout and the treble knob position would be fully CCW and the bass and mid knobs would be fully CW.
 
Why on earth would anyone ever set an amp like this?
well you see it was the 90s and I was enjoying Mexico's finest brick ... and while noodling around on my blues deville I decided I'd turn the treble all the way down and the bass and mids all the way up and play delta blues riffs ... only Boss would think that would sound amazing with a treble booster into it.
 
Back
Top