Coda
Well-known member
When I was young (20 years ago, or so), I got into The Doors. At the time (Sophomore) I thought that I was into some proper adult/mature music. As a result, I became a fan of the tones of Robby Krieger, especially his fuzz tone. For ages I was under the assumption that he used a Maestro FZ-1A...because he had said as much. Then, one rainy night (for dramatic purposes, anyway) I discovered never before seen (by me) photos of a concert at some place called The Hollywood Bowl. What did I see?....a Vox Tonebender. So what did he use? Maestro? Vox? The question haunted me, and still does to this day. I have come to the conclusion that the Maestro was never used by the Doors in the studio. The Tonebender was definitely used live, and probably in the studio. However, while the Tonebender nails the solo tone in My Eyes Have Seen you, it is nowhere near Hello, I Love You. In fact, the fuzz tones on the Waiting for the Sun album (as well as The Changeling, on LA Woman) sound nothing like the Vox Tonebender. What, then, is the mystery fuzz? Krieger himself is no help. In recent interviews (within the last year) he can only vaguely remember using a fuzz pedal, let alone which one it was specifically...
A month or so ago, I found a clue. Last October, I became the proud owner of a 1972 Acoustic Control Corp. 134, 4x10 combo amp. I then dove into the history of the company, and searched for ads, manuals, etc. I had known that the Doors used Acoustic amps live for a while (260), and never thought anything of it. Thing is, the Acoustic 260 had on-board fuzz.
There it is...the mystery fuzz tone. It is my hypothesis that Robby Krieger, beginning in 1968, used the Acoustic 260 in the studio for the fuzz tone...
So mystery solved. But that's not the end of the story. Now I'm obsessed. I would love to get a 260. Not particularly feasible at the moment, due to both price and availability issues. However, I do have a schematic. And in that schematic is the mystery fuzz. Attached you will find the fuzz section of the circuit. The issue is, however, that the things is just too damn blurry. I have done my best to identify the various components. My goal is to breadboard this circuit. But I need some help. Below is the BOM as best I can figure:
Resistors:
R30 - 22k
R31 - 100k
R32 - 470k
R33 - 680k
R34 - 22k
R35 - 1M
R36 - 100k
R37 - 47k
R38 - 22k
R39 - 6k8
R42 - 1M
R44 - 10k
R45 - 100k
Capacitors:
C21 - 100n
C22 - 100n
C23 - 150n
C24 - 100n
C25 - 100n
C26 - 2n5
C27 - 1n
C28 - 1u
C29 - 100u
C30 - 1u
Transistors:
Q8, 9, 10 - 2n3391 (maybe?)
Attack - 500k
Gain - 500k
I'm sure there are a few things that aren't necessary (Q7?), and I guessed on the transistors. This is where I could use an extra set of eyes. Another thing that jumps out is that, as you will notice (or not, there is no guarantee that anyone will bother), there is 25v at the power rail. If I were to try this as a pedal circuit, and went with the standard 9v, would I have to change some of the component values?
So...I could use an extra set of eyes with this. Who knows, this could turn into a Big Monk-esque PCB giveaway (just the giveaway part, not the "mod everything not nailed down," nor the endless revisions). I'll post the full schematic once I find a place to host a .pdf...
A month or so ago, I found a clue. Last October, I became the proud owner of a 1972 Acoustic Control Corp. 134, 4x10 combo amp. I then dove into the history of the company, and searched for ads, manuals, etc. I had known that the Doors used Acoustic amps live for a while (260), and never thought anything of it. Thing is, the Acoustic 260 had on-board fuzz.
There it is...the mystery fuzz tone. It is my hypothesis that Robby Krieger, beginning in 1968, used the Acoustic 260 in the studio for the fuzz tone...
So mystery solved. But that's not the end of the story. Now I'm obsessed. I would love to get a 260. Not particularly feasible at the moment, due to both price and availability issues. However, I do have a schematic. And in that schematic is the mystery fuzz. Attached you will find the fuzz section of the circuit. The issue is, however, that the things is just too damn blurry. I have done my best to identify the various components. My goal is to breadboard this circuit. But I need some help. Below is the BOM as best I can figure:
Resistors:
R30 - 22k
R31 - 100k
R32 - 470k
R33 - 680k
R34 - 22k
R35 - 1M
R36 - 100k
R37 - 47k
R38 - 22k
R39 - 6k8
R42 - 1M
R44 - 10k
R45 - 100k
Capacitors:
C21 - 100n
C22 - 100n
C23 - 150n
C24 - 100n
C25 - 100n
C26 - 2n5
C27 - 1n
C28 - 1u
C29 - 100u
C30 - 1u
Transistors:
Q8, 9, 10 - 2n3391 (maybe?)
Attack - 500k
Gain - 500k
I'm sure there are a few things that aren't necessary (Q7?), and I guessed on the transistors. This is where I could use an extra set of eyes. Another thing that jumps out is that, as you will notice (or not, there is no guarantee that anyone will bother), there is 25v at the power rail. If I were to try this as a pedal circuit, and went with the standard 9v, would I have to change some of the component values?
So...I could use an extra set of eyes with this. Who knows, this could turn into a Big Monk-esque PCB giveaway (just the giveaway part, not the "mod everything not nailed down," nor the endless revisions). I'll post the full schematic once I find a place to host a .pdf...