Nanolog Audio closes its doors

jeffwhitfield

Well-known member
I’ve been thinking about Nanolog Audio lately, mainly because of my experience with their devices late. I was going to write about a bad experience I had with their products…but upon gathering resources to write about this, I learned that Nanolog Audio has decided to close up shop. Pretty ironic considering my experience with them.

My experience started after reading about the Nanolog devices and how it differs from a typical diode. It was intriguing and I wondered what they would sound like in something like a Rat circuit. So I ordered an N2 on a whim and threw it into an AionFX Helios pedal I built. It sounded quite interesting compared to the default silicone diode option, somewhere between the silicone and a germanium diode actually. The character of the sound was interesting enough to make me want to try out Nanolog’s other devices: the N1a and N3.

Because Small Bear was closing, I ended up ordering from Next Gen instead. At around $16 a pop, these aren’t exactly cheap. So you can imagine my disappointment when only one out of three devices work. I was quite shocked actually, so much that I felt like I needed to throw these onto a basic component tester to be sure.

My DCA75 Pro registered the good ones as a Zener diode and the bad ones as a LED. Weird, right? So when I contacted Next Gen about the issue, their response wasn’t what I expected. I was told that testing these devices on a component tester, multimeter, or similar device voids the warranty. That didn’t sit well for me at all. Bogus if you ask me.

Since then, I’ve attempted to reach out to Nanolog on the issue with no response. Next Gen still maintains their position so I’m pretty much stuck with bad devices that I can’t use at all. The whole experience left me with a bad taste in my mouth.

So, yeah, when I learned that the Nanolog is closing shop…honestly, it doesn’t surprise me. While their devices are interesting, they’re also super finicky to work with apparently. Mix that with a rather high cost and you got a product that feels more like a bigger pain in the ass than what it’s worth. I honestly feel sorry for Nanolog and hope that one day another company will rise from their ashes and come up with a better device.
 
I've got a few of their devices laying around. Put one in a DS-2...cool, but they don't strike me as being worth the cost of admission.

The thing about multimeters is...well...you can burn these up if you apply too much voltage to them. That threshold is much lower than, say, a 1n914. if you use one in ohm mode, you meter is creating a 2vdc voltage across it's leads, and that is beyond what these can handle. Diode tests can generate even more.

IIRC, they did state on the little card that they came with that you should not use a meter on them. And much of the sales materials. Should Coolaudio warranty all V3207'S that the end user fries in a circuit designed for a MN3007? Cause the pin outputs are exactly the same...except the power supply polarity is reversed.

Or...say you use a center positive 9vdc adapter with a pedal that specifies center negative, and blow the protection diode. Should the manufacturer warranty the item?

It would certainly be *nice* if they did, but the truth of the matter is that electronic components are bound by certain physical constraints, and covering a replacement under warranty due to a customer unwittingly exposing that device to electrical forces beyond what the component is rated for gets real expensive, real fast.

I feel your pain here brother. And I get the impulse to be like "come ON! I was *just* using my meter!" It's understandable...but there are many components that can't handle the voltage generated by a multimeter, and that's an important lesson to learn. I would take the "L" here and use this as an opportunity to start checking out data sheets before experimenting with components. You might be surprised by what you catch...and what headaches you avoid.
 
That’s a shame. Their warnings about how sensitive they are combined with the cost made me hesitant to experiment with them at all— seemed too risky with my limited budget.
I hope this isn’t too much of a hinderance to Tom at Spiral Effects; he used the nanolog devices in a few of his flagship pedals, and that’s actually how I found out about the nanolog. I’m sure he can find a different clipper that fits the sound just as well, but the nanolog was a big part of the marketing around the first few designs he released.
 
I've got a few of their devices laying around. Put one in a DS-2...cool, but they don't strike me as being worth the cost of admission.

The thing about multimeters is...well...you can burn these up if you apply too much voltage to them. That threshold is much lower than, say, a 1n914. if you use one in ohm mode, you meter is creating a 2vdc voltage across it's leads, and that is beyond what these can handle. Diode tests can generate even more.

IIRC, they did state on the little card that they came with that you should not use a meter on them. And much of the sales materials. Should Coolaudio warranty all V3207'S that the end user fries in a circuit designed for a MN3007? Cause the pin outputs are exactly the same...except the power supply polarity is reversed.

Or...say you use a center positive 9vdc adapter with a pedal that specifies center negative, and blow the protection diode. Should the manufacturer warranty the item?

It would certainly be *nice* if they did, but the truth of the matter is that electronic components are bound by certain physical constraints, and covering a replacement under warranty due to a customer unwittingly exposing that device to electrical forces beyond what the component is rated for gets real expensive, real fast.

I feel your pain here brother. And I get the impulse to be like "come ON! I was *just* using my meter!" It's understandable...but there are many components that can't handle the voltage generated by a multimeter, and that's an important lesson to learn. I would take the "L" here and use this as an opportunity to start checking out data sheets before experimenting with components. You might be surprised by what you catch...and what headaches you avoid.
Yep, lesson learned. The problem was that they didn’t work to begin with in a known working circuit. I had a N2 working just fine. So when I got two that didn’t work, I honestly didn’t see the harm in using a DCA75 testing unit that is perfectly safe to use in just about and diode or transistor out there. I was after verification, nothing more.
 
Wow. I had no clue these things were that sensitive. I think they should’ve at least specified testing parameters, like maybe setting up an voltage divider (maybe they did I haven’t kept up with this stuff).

These things were so niche and expensive that it’s pretty easy to see why it wasn’t sustainable. I wonder if this is truly the end of carbon crystal crack diodes or whatever they are.
 
I got a pretty high percentage of duds from them. I had to set up a jig to test them in circuit with no DC using an oscilloscope. I even asked Tom Cram and he said he had the same problems.
 
I got a pretty high percentage of duds from them. I had to set up a jig to test them in circuit with no DC using an oscilloscope. I even asked Tom Cram and he said he had the same problems.
Yeah, that's what I feared after getting two duds. No way to really test them it seems without using a dedicated circuit to test with that doesn't bork the device and run against any warranty issues.
 
Wow. I had no clue these things were that sensitive. I think they should’ve at least specified testing parameters, like maybe setting up an voltage divider (maybe they did I haven’t kept up with this stuff).

These things were so niche and expensive that it’s pretty easy to see why it wasn’t sustainable. I wonder if this is truly the end of carbon crystal crack diodes or whatever they are.
That's the rub indeed and likely the reason they had to close shop. Just not a sustainable business model at all.
 
That's the rub indeed and likely the reason they had to close shop. Just not a sustainable business model at all.
Especially considering they were only available in retail through SBE.

Time for us to lock the working ones that we do have away...in a decade or so they might be the new unobtanium :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top