NJM5534D substitute?

[RICHB555]

Looking at building the Maximum Overdrive new offering. Tough locating a NJM5534D. Can anyone recommend a suitable substitute?

 

[analogdevice]

NE5534P

 

[eatkinola]

https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Texas-Instruments/NE5534P?qs=j%2FZo4ajzVJKxgUairxFvRg%3D%3D&srsltid=AfmBOoqcVIE-j4ZuybzLnhvJdO0p6GlMPj6Ru-7YAe_fNs8tzavr5YoZ

 

[Cybercow]

The MC1439 should sub nicely for the NJM5534D. The only significant difference between them is that the NJM5534 has a Slew-Rate of 13V/µs with a BJT (low impedance) input while the MC1439 has a Slew-Rate of 6V/µs with a BJT (low impedance) input. The difference is not retable by the human ear. Mouser has them.

 

[Passinwind]

The NJM5532/NE5532 will also sub nicely for the NJM5534D. The only significant difference between them is that the NJM5534 has a Slew-Rate of 13V/µs with a BJT (low impedance) input while the NJM5532 has a Slew-Rate of 9V/µs with a BJT (low impedance) input. The difference is not retable by the human ear. Mouser has them.

There's one other significant difference that might bear mentioning: 5534 is a single opamp and 5532 is a dual.

 

[RICHB555]

Thanks!

 

[drew.spriggs]

The NJM5532/NE5532 will also sub nicely for the NJM5534D. The only significant difference between them is that the NJM5534 has a Slew-Rate of 13V/µs with a BJT (low impedance) input while the NJM5532 has a Slew-Rate of 9V/µs with a BJT (low impedance) input. The difference is not retable by the human ear. Mouser has them.

Well...no.

There's quite a bit of difference between them, and you absolutely can't sub a 5532 for a 5534 without extensively redesigning the circuit - one is a single and one is a dual

 

[Cybercow]

There's one other significant difference that might bear mentioning: 5534 is a single opamp and 5532 is a dual.

Well...no.

There's quite a bit of difference between them, and you absolutely can't sub a 5532 for a 5534 without extensively redesigning the circuit - one is a single and one is a dual

Ack! You guys are right. Thanks for the catch. I copied/pasted the wrong part number when responding. Ive edited my original response to correct.

 

[Passinwind]

Ack! You guys are right. Thanks for the catch. I copied/pasted the wrong part number when responding. Ive edited my original response to correct.

It's an easy one to forget, especially if one uses OPA2132 and OPA2134 a lot, as I used to. Both of those are dualies...go figure!