Search results

You wire each gang as left and right. You, locked together they will track like a single knob dual gang. But you'll also have independent control if you desire. Left down, right up or... Inner down, outer up="pan" right. Etc. Not true dual mono planning but you can still balance left and right.

Or use dual concentric and have both options.

Stereo jacks or just dual mono jacks? I would consider using dual-concenteic pots. Then you can pan things. For single knob, use a dual gang pots. I'd go 9mm. For dual concentric...

Man. I think they may be the last maker of PN3565s.

Robert, are the programs duplicated on the eeprom 4x? @psycylus, if you life one side of R5, do you get a tremelo verb and a echo verb in the 2 switch positions? If not what 2 effects do you have?

Algolagnic HUT!

That's just a PITA. 17 resistors to bias a transistor stage. Oops All Resistors!

An opposite DEFX contest?

Yeah. Wire single pole momentary switch straight to a non-latching dpdt relay. LMS do have some 3pdt momentary footswitches as well I believe. I think they were on clearance. Not sure what their actuation force is.

Broooootal. Killed it. I second the demo. Need some chugga chugga with it dimed. I very aware we don't do this to save money, but you have got one hell of a custom piece there. Priceless.

The quads I linked earlier are similar. The photo sleeves are a lot thinner and flimsier. They kinda rely on the photo paper for rigidity. I immediately reinforced the quad sleeves with some staples, and I generally do this for a lot of componant sleeves as well. Q staple at the top of the seal...

I keep *most* of my components organized in binders by part numbers/values but I used the Stickman method for my PCBs still.

Maybea SM518

One N Fiftey one infinity

These aren't as robust as the BCW 6 pockets I commonly use but should hold at least some DEFX PCBs

Not trying to be a jerk or question design choices. Just curious. A peak under the hood if you will...

Gotcha. But not really think in terms of an RC filter and more so about the reactance vs frequency relationship of a given value. Just as the 200n input cap allows more bass through, the 100n decoupling cap will restrict it/allow less bass. Maybe this is all 99% lost using a revLog taper pot on...

If only there were universal symbols and abbreviations. Right?

Very cool tweaks and tidy design as always! One question. Is the input cap blend/low control not neutered by C4 and to a lesser extent C5 and on? Why not let the low end at least hit the clippers, if not the second stage as well?