comradehoser
Well-known member
I think if you follow the schematic correctly, then this will also follow. I don’t have any experience with spice but my understanding is that this is how that works.I’m not questioning the B10K itself. I’m trying to verify that both gangs of the Height control are represented correctly, including their connections, orientation and interaction with the surrounding filter network.
My circuit is very much this and so is everyone else’s apparently, thus the volume mod. It’s inherent to the circuit design. Not sure what an auto level would add to a master volume. That seems like an overly complex solution. I would think most guitarists would have one maybe two combos that they would use and would just dial in volume to taste.The digital model is based on the Acrobat schematic and a SPICE reconstruction. It already reproduces the expected cut/boost behaviour, but I’m investigating the rather large output-level variations across Height, Frequency and Bandwidth.
I can pretty much guarantee that the exact resistor to position assignment is the same as the schematicRegarding the rotary switch, I agree that the PCB should follow the schematic. I was simply hoping to independently verify the exact resistor-to-position assignments, since some of the traces are hidden beneath the assembled board
Last edited:
