Double Muffin, Again

[Strat68]

I'm using the Muffin Fuzz build doc as people suggested. But C12 is listed as 100nf but the PCB shows it as an electrolytic which I assume is not 100nf. Which is it?

I just looked at again, and it looks like all 100nf caps in the doc are shown on the board as electrolytics. Why not just produce a correct build doc in tjhe first place.

 

[Guardians of the analog]

That's not nice. It appears to be spaced for film caps but shows the positive leg if you use a polarized cap. Don't be so hard on @Robert, he has no floors smh

 

[Strat68]

That's not nice. It appears to be spaced for film caps but shows the positive leg if you use a polarized cap. Don't be so hard on @Robert, he has no floors smh
View attachment 117274

Fair enough. I overreacted. That is the assumption I would have made but didn't want to build it and have to go back and correct it. Love the cartoon.

 

[jwin615]

Fair enough. I overreacted. That is the assumption I would have made but didn't want to build it and have to go back and correct it. Love the cartoon.

As there are probably 100+ muff variants at this point, the PCB, as was the muffin, was designed to build many of them. I believe this is numbered to kit rae component numbering but I may be incorrect.
It was done this way for your convenience. So, if you want to build a modern doomer muff variant that uses 2u2 caps at C12 and C15, you can.

 

[Strat68]

As there are probably 100+ muff variants at this point, the PCB, as was the muffin, was designed to build many of them. I believe this is numbered to kit rae component numbering but I may be incorrect.
It was done this way for your convenience. So, if you want to build a modern doomer muff variant that uses 2u2 caps at C12 and C15, you can.

No, I'll build it as one of the listed variants. I'm essentially on the hunt for the Holy Grail which was a 1970's Muff that I should never have sold. Got a great price but should have kept it.