Chuck D. Bones
Circuit Wizard
Wouldn't hurt. Current draw is around 2.5mA. I wouldn't go any higher than 470Ω. I'll give it a try on the breadboard...
Dunno about yours, but what I've got on my board is eerily low noise.Make that 3.2mA. 700mV drop in a 220Ω resistor. Seems to work ok. I know you set the bias lower on yours so the current draw will less.
You must have built the MXR noise gate instead…Mine is dead silent. Probably due to the fact I haven't built it, but I haven't yet finished diagnosing, so I'm not going to commit to that possibility.
I don't think the PNP version would be more susceptible. Either polarity requires clean 9V power.So would the PNP version possibly more susceptible to noise compared to the NPN? A question that nags my brain...
Also, regarding noise suppression, Peter Rutter uses inductors in some of his designs for that, would that be a good one to nudge in?
Is there a typo in that sentence?Mine is dead silent. Probably due to the fact I haven't built it, but I haven't yet finished diagnosing, so I'm not going to commit to that possibility.
It would be useful for Q1 in a Tone Bender Mk II, though? That stage is leakage-biased and gets finicky when the temperature changes.Yes, but it's not needed for a Rangemaster. The Rangemaster's bias should be stable enough on its own.
Sure, I can breadboard that and report back. I'll admit that a big part of what interests me is the cool factor, for lack of a better term, of having a temperature stabilized, all Germanium Tone Bender Mk. II, as opposed to having a hybrid circuit that is less temperature-sensitive, even if the hybrid sounds similar.I'm not convinced that the TB mk2 first stage needs to be Germanium. If you're up for breadboarding, why not try a BMP first stage in place of the TB mk 2's first stage? Very stable bias and plenty of gain with the right resistor values.