This is exactly what I was looking for! Thank you. That response chart in section 2, page 6 is terrifying. That's honestly way worse than I would have imagined. Hope it's okay for me to repost here for the sake of future readers.
Yeah, I can't see myself utilizing these in any "clean" audio path moving forward. In a gnarly fuzz box, maybe just for the added nonlins,.but I'd still question if their additional would benefit the overall tonality. 0.15% THD from a singular passive component is a pretty wild. Even though that measurement is not completely in line with where we typically operate, especially with the higher DC bias, it's still rather indicative of their potential issues.
I'll be reading more into that paper this evening when I have time. Thanks for the link.
Have you read the Self book? Would you recommend it at the $60 price tag, or is there another one you would? I have several, but I circle back to the old Audio Cyclopedia more than most of my others. But it's a little hefty at 1700+ pages and the binding is starting to dry some so I have to baby it a bit.
View attachment 53705