Tater Tot (Barber Small Fry)

rhaas

Active member
Build Rating
5.00 star(s)
I'm way behind on posting build reports and figured I'd start with this one since it's probably my favorite pedal that I've built over the last few months. I decided to try it mostly on a whim: the clipping topology appealed to me (feedback loop clipping followed by diodes to ground, with variable resistance in series with the latter) but otherwise I had no specific expectations.

Wow! So many great sounds to be had. I can't decide if I like it better as a very light drive to get some transparent/unobtrusive compression+grit (useful when I can't turn my amp up as loud as I'd like — which is to say, most of the time :LOL:), or as a medium-high gain drive that's very warm and thick while still remaining articulate. David Barber talks about the importance of chord clarity in his pedal voicing, and that approach is really apparent here.

There are so many different and satisfying textures to be had by varying the Burn and Dynamics controls... speaking of which, the one thing that confused me at first is that the Dynamics control seems to work backwards compared to the original pedal. Disclaimer: I've never played an actual Small Fry but based on the manual and some demos I watched, the original gets more compressed in the CCW direction, whereas the Tater Tot gets more compressed in the CW direction. Really not an issue, and it kind of makes sense if you think of it as a "Compression" control rather than Dynamics. :)

Another note: I didn't have any Ge diodes on hand so I used BAT41s. I run the Dynamics control pretty low (more resistance in series with the diodes), so I'm not sure that this would make much of a difference.

All in all, fantastic pedal and kudos to Mr. Barber (and @Robert of course for this layout that fits in a more pedalboard-friendly box)!


IMG_6501.png

IMG_6504.png
 
Last edited:
I'm way behind on posting build reports and figured I'd start with this one since it's probably my favorite pedal that I've built over the last few months. I decided to try it mostly on a whim: the clipping topology appealed to me (feedback loop clipping followed by diodes to ground, with variable resistance in series with the latter) but otherwise I had no specific expectations.

Wow! So many great sounds to be had. I can't decide if I like it better as a very light drive to get some transparent/unobtrusive compression+grit (useful when I can't turn my amp up as loud as I'd like — which is to say, most of the time :LOL:), or as a medium-high gain drive that's very warm and thick while still remaining articulate. David Barber talks about the importance of chord clarity in his pedal voicing, and that approach is really apparent here.

There are so many different and satisfying textures to be had by varying the Burn and Dynamics controls... speaking of which, the one thing that confused me at first is that the Dynamics control seems to work backwards compared to the original pedal. Disclaimer: I've never played an actual Small Fry but based on the manual and some demos I watched, the original gets more compressed in the CCW direction, whereas the Tater Tot gets more compressed in the CW direction. Really not an issue, and it kind of makes sense if you think of it as a "Compression" control rather than Dynamics. :)

Another note: I didn't have any Ge diodes on hand so I used BAT41s. I run the Dynamics control pretty low (more resistance in series with the diodes), so I'm not sure that this would make much of a difference.

All in all, fantastic pedal and kudos to Mr. Barber (and @Robert of course for this layout that fits in a more pedalboard-friendly box)!


View attachment 58914

View attachment 58915
Very under rated pedal. This is the best "Zen" drive out there. Super flexible and as you noted, lots of sounds.
 
Last edited:
Thank you! I'm still enjoying this pedal, though lately I've been using the Symbolic (Simble) for a change. I'll post a build report for that and a few others in the coming days.
That's funny, I've been re-visiting the Simble recently as well. When I originally built it, I compared it to the Zen drive and other Zen variants. But out of all my "Dumble" drives, the Simble sounds the closest to my actual Dumble amp clone. (Not the Zen).
I also have a tube based Dumble preamp (Tubesteader Beekeeper) and the Simble sounds the closest to the tube overdrive it produces as well. I've developed some new appreciation for the Simble when I originally kinda wrote it off after finding out it wasn't designed by Bjorn Juhls.
 
That's funny, I've been re-visiting the Simble recently as well. When I originally built it, I compared it to the Zen drive and other Zen variants. But out of all my "Dumble" drives, the Simble sounds the closest to my actual Dumble amp clone. (Not the Zen).
I also have a tube based Dumble preamp (Tubesteader Beekeeper) and the Simble sounds the closest to the tube overdrive it produces as well. I've developed some new appreciation for the Simble when I originally kinda wrote it off after finding out it wasn't designed by Bjorn Juhls.
I also built a Zen clone and could never quite bond with it. The tone was always darker than I preferred and there was a stiffness to the attack that I didn't like. The voicing and drive characteristics of the Simble are much more to my liking. :)

As a side note, I recently joined a Dead tribute band and I had been using the Symbolic for my low-gain, almost-always-on tone. I'd switch to the Tater Tot for dirtier sounds. Now, I have the Symbolic swapped in for the Tater Tot and am using a Scenario (Gladio SC) for clean-ish tones. This all just highlights that I need to write up more build reports. 🤣

Here's the old setup:

IMG_7823.jpeg
 
Back
Top