Buffer. Just a buffer.

MattG

Well-known member
Here's my submission for most boring build of 2026: an always-on unity gain buffer. It's... delightfully unremarkable! The opamp is an opa1678. Since that's a dual opamp, it's basically a double-buffer with a little bit of high-frequency filtering between active stages. (And the opa1678 has some inbuilt RF protections.)

The back side is a fully contiguous ground plane!

The only interesting part was the mechanical aspect: for my first attempt, I just eye-balled the drill holes, and ended up with something that didn't work.

So I took a little time to measure on the second attempt, to ensure I'd end up with something that can actually be assembled.

This is my first 1590A build, and even though the PCB itself is tiny, the mechanical/fitment aspects are really challenging!

The intent is for this to be mounted underneath my pedalboard.

Edit: See post #16 below for an update v1.0 buid.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3339.jpg
    IMG_3339.jpg
    250 KB · Views: 111
  • IMG_3338.jpg
    IMG_3338.jpg
    241.7 KB · Views: 104
  • IMG_3340.jpg
    IMG_3340.jpg
    237.1 KB · Views: 114
  • IMG_3341.jpg
    IMG_3341.jpg
    249.9 KB · Views: 107
Last edited:
Would you be willing to share the schematic? I'm curious about the extra filtering you added.

Sure! It's truly just a little bit - it's basically R11 and C15. C19 at the input also provides a little filtering too.
 

Attachments

  • standalone_opa1678_buffer_v1.0_schematic.png
    standalone_opa1678_buffer_v1.0_schematic.png
    58.7 KB · Views: 39
If you have more pcbs handy to make another, I’d recommend fitting a 2pdt toggle for true bypass. I have one and I like it for testing purposes (testing like: does this pedal sound different with a buffer? Can I hear the effect of a buffer at this part of the chain?)
 
I made a few small tweaks to the design:
  • added more RF filtering
  • increased power supply filtering/decoupling capacitance
  • used 3x10uF tantalum caps for VREF capacitor
  • used a smaller opa1678 package (because it's cheaper)
  • ponied up for ENIG surface finish

The original design was perfectly practical I think. Now I'm happily in the deliciously overkill territory.

For this build, I put the I/O jacks on opposing sides, because it works better for my board.

Lesson learned with this build: don't use standard/full-size I/O jacks in 1590A enclosures!

Other than the final assembly headache, everything works great!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3440.jpg
    IMG_3440.jpg
    303.9 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_3444.jpg
    IMG_3444.jpg
    278.3 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_3442.jpg
    IMG_3442.jpg
    295.9 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_3445.jpg
    IMG_3445.jpg
    109.7 KB · Views: 9
  • standalone-buffer-smd-v1.1-20260912.png
    standalone-buffer-smd-v1.1-20260912.png
    61.6 KB · Views: 12
Back
Top