apc42069
Well-known member
beautiful- thanks Dr. BonesYes, I have just corrected the typo in my post.
beautiful- thanks Dr. BonesYes, I have just corrected the typo in my post.
As long as the specs were the same as the LDR.Would a vactrol work here or do we specifically need a LED/LDR combo? I think I've got a few vactrols from Electronic Goldmine and am wondering if those would work here.
Series connection would be better because parallel LEDs won't share current equally. One may hog most of the current.I would like to propose just one modification to the circuit: I connected another white LED in parallel to the LED that drives the photoresistor, a second LED that I mounted on the front panel of the pedal, and which visually gives me an estimate of the amount of compression applied.
Very clever!This circuit could be the basis for developing a multiband optical compressor, similar to FEA, using two Wardens modified according to D. Bones. I attach the diagram (tested and working).
It's still done that way. Commercial PCB fab has become so economical, even in small quantities, that it's hard to justify doing it at home. I've seen PCBs etched using a CNC engraver, but it's slow and expensive....when I graduated they were still using acids to etch the tracks, I believe that now there are more efficient and precise techniques...
I have half a dozen warden pcbs on the way and danng im glad i found this thread. You lost me with the LED's....but thats at the bottom of the mod list so we'll see when i get there. Thanks for the contributionThis post describes the mods in the Col. Klink.
The EQD Warden is a good optical compressor. Basic design is mostly sound, with one major defect, one minor defect and a few opportunities for improvement. Parts of this design were lifted from the Ross compressor.
Major Defect
The signal path is routed through Q1, where is gets distorted by the non-linear loading from D2 & Q3. This is easily corrected by disconnecting C14 from Q1-E and connecting it to IC1 pin 1. You can do this on top of the board simply by lifting the + lead of C14 out of the pad and running a jumper to the end of R5 closest to IC1. I did it by cutting and jumpering on the bottom of the board. If you're not experienced in trace cutting, then do the mod on the top of the board.
View attachment 4365
Minor Defect
The bottom end of the TONE control is useless. I don't know about you, but I have no use for a treble cut in a compressor. A little treble boost brings the sparkle back that gets lost in compression. The stock tone control is flat at about 8:00 or 8:30 and below that cut treble. At 7:00 it's a very strong treble cut. Installing a 20K resistor in series with pin 1 of the TONE pot fixes that. Now 7:00 is flat and it's all treble boost above that. You can cut the TONE pot's lead short and install the 20K resistor between pin 1 and the board, or use a solder lug pot like I did.
View attachment 4366
Opportunities for Improvement
1. Q1 biasing. Q1 is biased close to saturation, which reduces its dynamic range. If we correct the major defect above, this mod is less important. However I wanted to maximize the performance of the envelope detector and remove any loading effect from the output of IC1.1. Replace C5 with a 3.3K resistor (stand it up). Replace R6 with a 10K resistor. Do not solder the bottom end (the end furthest from Q1) to the pad, solder it to the next pad over at the end of R7 (also 10K).
View attachment 4367
2. Better component values.
2a. Change R3 to 2.2M, change R1 to 2.2M or larger; I used 4.7M. R3 = 10M makes no sense when R1 = 1M. Change C2 to 100nF, 1uF is at least 10x larger than it needs to be, even with R3 reduced to 2.2M.
2b. Change R4 to 10K for 6dB more sustain.
2c. Change the LEVEL pot from B50K to A50K. Gets unity closer to noon.
Parts Substitutions
This is all very optional. I did it because I had the parts.
Q1-Q3 can be any high-gain NPN transistor. I used 2N5210. They can all be 2N5088, 2N5089, MPSA18, etc. Don't waste your best transistors here.
I used some fast rectifiers for D4 & D5 to improve the charge pump efficiency. 1N5817 is also a good choice.
I used TC7662 for IC2, it is slightly more efficient that the usual suspects.
A note about the LED & LDR.
I used a frosted white LED. It's very bright even at low current. It turned out to be overkill. The LDR I used is in a TO-18 can, obtained from Electronic Goldmine. They were dirt cheap on sale, like 40 cents each. One ot two stinkers in the bunch, but the rest went from under 2K (illuminated) to over 2Meg (dark). Cadmium Sulfide LDRs have a quick response to light, their resistance drops in a few milliseconds. Their response to dark is much slower, over 100ms to get from 2K to 500K. The more light that hit them, the longer it takes for the resistance to go up. That's why a bright LED isn't always a good thing. I find it best to set the ATTACK at 8:00 or 9:00 so the peak LED current is less and the release is quicker.
good to know, im actually in the process of ordering parts for the pcbs I ordered and Amplified parts has 2 options:OPA134 for $3, and OPA2134 for $8. Any recommendations..is that part choice greatly effect the tone?Just don't use a super-bright LED and leave some distance between between the LED & LDR.
The circuit calls for a 2134 (dual op amp), so a 134 won’t be suitable.good to know, im actually in the process of ordering parts for the pcbs I ordered and Amplified parts has 2 options:OPA134 for $3, and OPA2134 for $8. Any recommendations..is that part choice greatly effect the tone?
This all day long.If price is a consideration, then use a TL072. Unless you're building a recording studio, the difference between a premium audio-grade opamp and TL072 will not be noticeable.
Actually was thinking about maybe recording with it (depending if I end up tone shaping with it), But i do have a bunch of TL072s so we'll se, thanks for the substituteIf price is a consideration, then use a TL072. Unless you're building a recording studio, the difference between a premium audio-grade opamp and TL072 will not be noticeable.
I hear ya, charge pumps are not my favorite either. You can delete the charge pump and you will give up 4 or 5dB of headroom. Maybe that's ok. If you want to keep the same performance in the peak detector, you'll need to cut a few resistor values in half.
The NSL-32 should work fine as long as it's fast enough. (...) To measure the light resistance, power the LED side with 9V and a 4.7K resistor in series. Measure the resistance of the LDR side. Should be <10K. Now remove the power from the LED side and watch the resistance reading go up. The faster the better, Should get above 1M in a fraction of a second. We want >2M dark resistance.
Hello to all! New member and first post here. Going to dive into a build on a Delegate kit, but with the original PCB (that's just what came with the kit I purchased). Came here to go over the details and found this post, and glad I did so.2. Better component values.
2a. Change R3 to 2.2M, change R1 to 2.2M or larger; I used 4.7M. R3 = 10M makes no sense when R1 = 1M. Change C2 to 100nF, 1uF is at least 10x larger than it needs to be, even with R3 reduced to 2.2M.