Germany is OTT! If you buy so much as a replacement bolt for a worn one on your car, for example, it's gotta be in the car's logbook.
As for
@Bricksnbeatles "Oops... Wrong-808" ...
Can Roland issue a Cease&Desist? They could try but it would fall apart in court:
- The stylised "S" is not a stylised "R" — Roland cannot begrudge other people/companies using two lines to make a letter.
- "Wrong-808" — NONE of Roland's products are specifically named "Wrong-808". Roland does not have a monopoly on the number "808" and if they did they'd have gone after Ibanez a long time ago because Ibanez has a LOT more money than one student named Mr Simms.
Bricksn could easily defend that the number does in fact make reference to the Tube Screamer, and even then, Ibanez couldn't come after Mr Simms for the number alone, but...
- Colours — Roland doesn't have a monopoly on sequenced bars of colours. If you manage to mix some paint to the exact shade of Tiffany Blue, and paint your house or car in it, Tiffany's isn't interested. Start selling jewellery in Tiffany coloured boxes that say "Tifanny" and the brand-lawyers of Tiffany & Co are going to get to work on a C&D order, especially if they can prove you have the exact paint-code for "Tiffany Blue".
Grain of salt: I'm not a lawyer, but I know an IP lawyer and if I'm still betting...
I bet there is nothing litigiously wrong, from Roland's POV, about the "Oops Wrong-808" pedal.
From Ibanez's point of view, there probably IS something wrong with using the word "Tubescreamer" on an effects pedal that shares the numbers eight, zero, and eight. Would Ibby issue a C&D?
PS:
Trademark evolved out of "passing off", passing off being a long-established iconic symbol or other identifying thing about a company that may not be Trademarked but is so well established it is synonymous with the company: Simms vs Roland — would people mistake the two companies' undertakings?
Registered design rights and copyrights tests whether it is original ... number of shades, tones etc — if Roland can prove that the sequence of colours is well-established enough that a consumer might mistake Simms Sounds' undertakings for Roland's and that.
Roland might not win in court, but might still initiate an action as a way of bullying/intimidating knowing Simms doesn't have the financial resources to pay the lawyers to fight it in court. Between mutually big companies, often these sorts of suits are settled outside of court, even if after initial litigation has started.
If Roland won, as
unlikely as that would be (if lawyer-fees on both sides was irrelevant), Roland would get damages — so how much profit is Simms making on this "Oops..." endeavour? A handful of pedals worth how much? At what point would it be worthwhile for Roland to seek damages, maybe if Simms Sound was selling 100k of these pedals?
TR-808 vs TS-808:
The TR-808 was launched in 1980, the TS-808 beat it by one year when it launched in 1979 — to the best of my knowledge there's been no litigation between Roland and Ibanez over the similarities in product-code numbering.
Back to the topic at hand, out of money and parts blues... I need enclosures and jacks. A LOT of those and potentiometers two, too. Spent all my savings (and then some) on other parts just to get some boards populated.
So, yeah, I have those blues...