I haven't heard the M3 but have the CKIII versions and did my own board Good stuff ABMTo add my own input...
I built a headphone amp a while back that I absolutely love, and I'm in the process of building a second one for my father. It's a community-designed circuit that AMB sells the circuit boards for called the M3. It's not a terribly expensive build, but it's certainly a bit more than an average pedal.
I've got a little collection of cans...nothing too crazy or ridiculous. It's easy to get up one's own ass when exploring the audiophile world. I tend to use mine with a pair of BLON planar magnetics or my Sennheiser HD 6xx.
Something that I really appreciate about the one I built is it's sense of "space" in the stereo image and quick tracking of low end transients. I've attached the schematic, which is open-source.
Something I've noticed over the years is that the majority of the commercial guitar headphone amps I've used have felt pretty claustrophobic and sterile, more of an afterthought and a race-to-the-bottom make it cheap cheap cheap toy than something I'd actually want to spend time with. And using one for bass...typically ends up being a smeary, unfocused mess.
So...that is to say...it would be really cool to build something with enough "oomph" behind it to drive a pair of circumaural cans competently, enough capacitance on tap to cleanly reproduce the low end transients of a bass guitar, and something that sounds more akin to the "amp in a room" soundstage than the typical "hey bud get your ears ready for this mono exploration of sandpaper and ice-pickery".
Again, it's easy to get up one's own ass when it comes to the world of audiophile headphones and amps and cork-flatulence-sniffing, BUT...there are little pieces to be snagged from that world that could be utilized to create something quite capable and FUN to use.
Granted, not everyone's gonna have $200-300 headphones to enjoy it with, but my vote goes toward "overbuild that shit".
View attachment 18467
Granted, not everyone's gonna have $200-300 headphones to enjoy it with, but my vote goes toward "overbuild that shit".
A few questions if you don’t mind
Here is the earliest incarnation of my desk unit.
The signal chain goes fuzz to fx loop 1 to oc-2 to fx loop 2 to amp sim 1 to amp sim 2 to cab sim to fx loop 3 to reverb.
From the reverb it goes to a switch that selects whether it goes to the headphone section or to the direct out. Direct out is for recording into an interface.
The headphone section has a headphone amp and an auxiliary in.
I use it to practice and write and record and for travels. Sounds killer and works well through the jambox
I am always available to answer questions, whether or not I answer them correctly is another thing.A few questions if you don’t mind
1. Are you running all these off the same power tap?
2. What headphone amp and mixer circuit are you using? Is it mono or stereo?
3. Is that a Hammond 1456 enclosure?
4. Do you have updates build pictures? Looks great
Thank you for the reply!I am always available to answer questions, whether or not I answer them correctly is another thing.
1. Yes, the whole idea behind this is everything powered off of a one spot. To answer then next question you may have, no I have no issues with hum.
2. It is a mono headphone amp and mixer that @Chuck D. Bones came up with when I asked for some help. It works really well for what I use it for.
3. I believe that is the enclosure, I ordered it from my usual enclosure place, Hawk Electronics. I will dig into this some more and get you the exact model number.
4. I do not have any pictures taken but can tell you this took a back seat until last Monday. It is almost completely done, I have one last little character to paint and then I will film the video for it. It is the hardest I have ever worked on any DIY project and is turning out really cool.
+1Can we PLEASE get something with stereo inputs? Stereo pedals in headphones are an amazing experience.
Can we PLEASE get something with stereo inputs? Stereo pedals in headphones are an amazing experience.
I feel attacked. Haven’t I ever told you about my pseudo-5.1 rig plansHow about a 36-speaker, hex-amped full surround-multi-level sound, with switchable Dolby/THX?
I had that setup in a '73 Gremlin.How about a 36-speaker, hex-amped full surround-multi-level sound, with switchable Dolby/THX?
As you wish. This is a 39-channel, 39- amp setup (8 bottom + 12 middle + 12 upper + 3 ceiling + 4 subs), but close enoughHow about a 36-speaker, hex-amped full surround-multi-level sound, with switchable Dolby/THX?
You must have gotten the tardis package on that Gremlin. Nice!As you wish. This is a 39-channel, 39- amp setup (8 bottom + 12 middle + 12 upper + 3 ceiling + 4 subs), but close enough