Time for this thread to get a conspiracy theory bump.
So I had pulled the stock tubes out of the monoprice and stuck them in another amp while the monoprice is getting overhauled. The stock Monoprice tubes are blank, no logo, no brand name, just a small manufacturing date code on the side.
Well tonight I was cleaning up the workbench and found a pair of matched Psvane 12AX7, and figured I would swap them into the amp I had the MP tubes in. As I briefly set them next to each other on the floor, it seemed odd that the tubes were the same size, Psvane are a little shorter than most 12AX7. I picked one of each up to examine them closer, and the internals of the tube were 100% identical. Tube manufacturers all have proprietary steps in their process that make them different, so it's common for things to look a little different between two brands. These were IDENTICAL.
Growing suspicious, I threw the MP tubes into my uTracer tube tester. One of the things I've noticed about the Psvane tubes I've seen, despite their datasheet giving a mu of 100, they consistently test in the 80-85 range, a little low for a 12AX7. Well on the Monoprice tube I tested, one triode came up as 80 and the other as 82. Right in line with all the Psvanes I've tested.
Psvane are supposedly a "premium" Chinese tube*, but based on every test and check I am able to do, they seem to be completely identical to the no-name tubes found in my Monoprice amp. I don't know what this means, but it's bothering me.
Yes, I'm well-caffeinated this evening.
*YMMV I used Psvane for a few months totaling about 200 tubes installed in customer pedals, and they had a much higher failure rate (about 20% within 3 months) than I've seen in JJ tubes (less than 1% within 3 months), my usual brand