TB-92 Silicon Treble Booster

lowpitch

Well-known member
Build Rating
5.00 star(s)
I just wanted to breadboard a Brian May treble booster. Now here I am over half a year later with my own treble booster design while still not having breadboarded a Brian May booster. Oh well.

101.png

At its heart this is still just a Rangemaster. There's an aggressive bass cut followed by a single transistor gain stage. Input impedance is very low and the pedal deliberately loads down the guitar pickups in order to take some of the top end shrillness out of the tone. The low input impedance also makes the pedal clean up very nicely by just turning down the volume on the guitar.
Some of my modifications include a "noiseless biasing" network, improved power filtering, as well as feedback resistors and capacitors around the transistor to tailor the tone to my own liking. The transistor - a ZTX651 - was chosen after auditioning around 30 silicon transistors. It's a medium gain (around 200 hFE) power transistor with pretty high parasitic capacitances compared to other more popular silicon transistors. From my listening tests these parasitic capacitances were a deciding factor in how smooth or harsh a transistor sounds in circuit.
While the final circuit design was specifically tweaked around the ZTX651, the following transistors also had something unique about them that I liked: 2N5550, 2N5551, SS8050, KSC1008, KTD718, TIP41C, BD139 and 2N5088.

To get a little more mileage out of the circuit I experimented with a variety of tone controls and whittled it down to the following:

Level - Classic Rangemaster post-gain volume control. Linear taper pot because I found the sweep range more useful than log taper.
Edge - Variable emitter resistor to change the collector bias from roughly 7V to 3V. Lower bias gives a more compressed, modern tone.
Body - Naga Viper style Range control but reversed and with tweaked values. Essentially a pre-gain bass control. I much prefer this over downright switching the input capacitor value.
Texture (Brash/Smooth) - Somewhat of a pre-gain treble control. Switches between three different base-emitter capacitors. Affects mostly pick attack as well as hiss.

I designed the PCB in DipTrace and had it manufactured by JLCPCB. The enclosure design was done in Illustrator and printed by Tayda on a matte white sand 1590B enclosure.

102.png
 

Attachments

  • silicon_treble_booster_1.0.png
    silicon_treble_booster_1.0.png
    153.5 KB · Views: 55
Last edited:
Beautiful work! I love the orientation of the pots, and the little slide switch.

I've been wanting to play with/tweak the rangemaster just like this, maybe I should get off my ass and do it! The Edge control sounds especially interesting. And for the Body control, this is just an tweakable RC filter, instead of just changing out input caps, right?

Would you be opposed to sharing the gerbers and art files for it? I'd love to have a pro looking one like this!
 
Beautiful work! I love the orientation of the pots, and the little slide switch.

I've been wanting to play with/tweak the rangemaster just like this, maybe I should get off my ass and do it! The Edge control sounds especially interesting. And for the Body control, this is just an tweakable RC filter, instead of just changing out input caps, right?

Would you be opposed to sharing the gerbers and art files for it? I'd love to have a pro looking one like this!
Thanks! Do it, the circuit is easy to breadboard and modify. Try out different resistors, capacitors and transistors and see how they change the tone and feel of the circuit.
The input capacitor C1 is part of an RC filter. Its value in conjunction with the impedance as set by the biasing network and the transistor itself determines the cut-off frequency of the filter. A low value capacitor will have a higher cut-off frequency than a high value capacitor. The Body control provides a parallel path for the input signal that keeps almost all the bass frequencies in tact due to the high value of C2. The way I have it wired turning the Body control clockwise decreases the resistance of the parallel path and let's more of the full-range signal through while turning it counter-clockwise increases the resistance until most of the signal only goes through C1.
I'm selling these pedals currently and feel reluctant to directly share gerbers and enclosure art because of that, sorry. I have no problems with anyone cooking up their own PCB design or vero layout based on the schematic though and doing their own take on my enclosure art. For layout inspiration, I shared my DipTrace layout in this post: https://forum.pedalpcb.com/threads/bring-out-yer-diptrace.11287/page-32#post-355210 Have fun with the circuit!
 
Last edited:
Nice! I'll have to try this. Been doing up treble boosters on vero scraps lately; I might have a piece that'll fit this left. And I love me an oddball transistor. Any criteria for selecting your test candidates, or just what was nearby?

Also, out of curiosity, how do you like to use it?
 
Nice! I'll have to try this. Been doing up treble boosters on vero scraps lately; I might have a piece that'll fit this left. And I love me an oddball transistor. Any criteria for selecting your test candidates, or just what was nearby?

Also, out of curiosity, how do you like to use it?
At some point I just started adding random transistors to my Tayda and Mouser carts because I thought they sounded cool :D Initially I was looking specifically for lower gain transistors though, as well as models which are available in different hFE ranges, like BC549A/B/C.

My go-to rock tone is an SSS strat into a treble booster and then straight into a Marshall DSL100H on the crunch channel, which is a little on the loose side compared to the ultra channels. I generally like treble boosters best with loose sounding amps, although you can also get some nice metal tones with humbuckers -> treble booster -> modern high-gain amp. Just beware the hissssss.
 
At some point I just started adding random transistors to my Tayda and Mouser carts because I thought they sounded cool :D Initially I was looking specifically for lower gain transistors though, as well as models which are available in different hFE ranges, like BC549A/B/C.

My go-to rock tone is an SSS strat into a treble booster and then straight into a Marshall DSL100H on the crunch channel, which is a little on the loose side compared to the ultra channels. I generally like treble boosters best with loose sounding amps, although you can also get some nice metal tones with humbuckers -> treble booster -> modern high-gain amp. Just beware the hissssss.
Do you have a go-to treble booster circuit or transistor that has the least hiss? I don't play anywhere near metal gain, and noise is the biggest reason I don't use TBs more often. And why I want to tweak a circuit myself, to find the lowest noise floor possible.
 
Do you have a go-to treble booster circuit or transistor that has the least hiss? I don't play anywhere near metal gain, and noise is the biggest reason I don't use TBs more often. And why I want to tweak a circuit myself, to find the lowest noise floor possible.
To be honest, I think hiss is kind of inherent to the design. Maybe try some of the various Brian May Treble Booster circuits, like the Fryer TB schematic below. These often cut more highs than other circuits and should generally be less hissy as a result. You can increase the value of the base-emitter capacitor to cut more treble. At 6.8nF - like the smooth setting in my circuit - I found hiss to be negligible, at least for my purposes. Pick attack is softened though. You can also experiment with capacitors from collector to base. Low values will do a lot here due to the miller effect. I'd start with 47pF and adjust up for more treble cut and hiss reduction and down for less. A cap to ground on the output like below can also cut down hiss.
Another one to try is the ROG Omega https://www.runoffgroove.com/omega.html It's FET-based and supposed to be optimized for low noise. Haven't built this one though, so I don't know.

1764180256903.png
 
Last edited:
Curious if you tried a 2n3903? Have a bunch in my box but haven't used them in a circuit yet.
I did. These are all the transistors I tested:
IMG_20251127_002406.jpg
X is bad, circle is good or at least interesting. As you can see it doesn't have an X, so that's good. No circle either though, so I guess it didn't really stick out to me when I tested it. Should be a solid choice though, especially for circuits that require lower hFE. And honestly, I think you can make any circuit work with almost any transistors if you're willing to put some time into tweaking it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top