Feral Feline
Well-known member
I looked at that Pellucid, ‘twould be grand to have a Boneyard Edition!
Have you stop struggling with the other You Know What compressor before you start this one?I found another clever compressor design. Hmmmmmm.
https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=122568.0
For the moment, yes, but I will come back to the Engineer's Middle Finger.
The problem I was having with the EMF was that at high RATIO settings, the attack was too pronounced. My thinking was that the peak detector was not tracking a rapid rise in the envelope quickly enough. The Engineer's Thumb uses a half-wave rectifier in the peak detector circuit and tracks only the negative peaks in the guitar signal. This can cause a 1/2-cycle delay in the peak detector. Other compressors, such as the Delegate & General Tsao, employ a full-wave rectifier that tracks both peaks. The Pellucid also uses a full-wave rectifier in the peak detector. I wanted to see how much difference that made. The Pellucid's full-wave rectifier does improve the peak tracking and the attack is smoother, however it's my observation that aggressive picking with the bridge pickup creates an attack so abrupt that there is still somewhat of a "pop" on the first cycle of the note. I'm starting to think that I had an unrealistic expectation of how well a compressor can control such an abrupt attack. The other thing I'm looking at is the difference in release between a feed-forward circuit like the ET and a feedback circuit like the Pellucid. The ET measures the signal volume coming into the compressor and uses that to adjust the gain. The Pellucid measures the signal volume coming out of the compressor and uses that to adjust the gain. Both gain control methods have advantages and disadvantages.
Nice, but now it has 4 knobs.
One is invisible...it's all the rage.Nice, but now it has 4 knobs.