Username123
Well-known member
Makes sense to me!Think it has to do with string tension. There’s more tension on the longer strings, hence the poppier sound. Less tension gives a loose, more open, hollow sound.
Makes sense to me!Think it has to do with string tension. There’s more tension on the longer strings, hence the poppier sound. Less tension gives a loose, more open, hollow sound.
Peaveys are sleepers for sure. They've gone up in price lately, but you can still get a quality USA made Peavey for a bargain.I've always wanted a danelectro longhorn bass.
@BuddytheReow don't overlooked used peavey basses. They used to be cheap but it seems like nothing is cheap anymore. My wife played a early 90s peavey dyna that I got for like $200
I found some good uses for a short scale bass. They produce less overtones and make it easier to modify the sound. As such, you can do cool things like changing the octave and adding gnarly amounts of distortion without it sounding weird. I tried doing this sort of thing with my 5-string Ibanez but didn't have as much luck. But with a short scale bass it was pretty much instant.Short scale anything is not for me. I had a short scale bass and never bonded with it. It felt wierd. Pbass for me. If Jamerson could do all he did with one bass I don't need nothing else.
Sorry to be the "uh...akshully" guy but all modern Fenders have a 9.5" fretboard radius. P basses have a 1 5/8" nut (vintage is 1 3/4) while all Jazz basses have a 1.5" nut. They all have the same 19mm string spacing at the the bridge.Personally I prefer passive basses. I think that a precision or jazz would be able to cover most people's needs. The MM SUBs are nice (I have one) but you are then stuck with a very particular sound. Nothing wrong with it, it sounds great, it's just a very specific sound.
I prefer a P neck (9.5" radius) over a J neck (12" radius) but I'd say that the majority probably prefer a J.
Ibanez make some good lower model instruments but I always found their necks anemic, but you may dig that.
The short vs. long scale thing is interesting to me because it's counterintuitive. Short scales supposedly produce more low end so, imo, the difference is a little bit more of a question of sound than feel. Though I am an absolute pig of a low end junkie, I still prefer both the sound and feel of long scales.
Don't apologize for being that guy I can take itSorry to be the "uh...akshully" guy but all modern Fenders have a 9.5" fretboard radius. P basses have a 1 5/8" nut (vintage is 1 3/4) while all Jazz basses have a 1.5" nut. They all have the same 19mm string spacing at the the bridge.
I'm also a P bass guy. Jazz basses feel cramped.
I second the suggestion of getting a used bass. Squier Classic Vibe if you decide to go the Fender Shaped Object route.
I have two short scale basses but the real sound is in the 34" scale. More flexible too. Tons of strings to choose from and you can downtune to accommodate a singer without entering floppy town.
Sire is killing it with the Marcus Miller line. Arguably a much better value than Squiers and Mexican Fenders.
If you are in Europe, Thomann's house brand Harley Benton has a number of clones of famous basses (Fender, Rickenbacker, Music Man, Hofner). These are all made in China or Indonesia and very good value.
A little TLC is always necessary but nothing major. Any competent tech can get you up and running for little money. Emphasis on competent.
Could be. Was it the case in the past that J's had a 12" radius? I may just be operating with outdated information as I've been out of the game for a while.Maybe you got the idea from the American Ultra Jazz that they make right now. It has a compound radius
American Ultra Jazz Bass® | Electric Basses
American Ultra Jazz Bass®, Maple Fingerboard, Texas Teawww.fender.com