AMI 'Spirit of 76' (Median Compressor)

I'm a few parts short on this one (I swear I ordered the IC's and a C25k ) from Mouser but maybe I just dreamt it. Looking forward to it. What's the deal here, it looks like laser into powdercoat and then gold backfilled? Lovely looking pedal and the gold switch with creme knobs looks very classy.
 
I'm a few parts short on this one (I swear I ordered the IC's and a C25k ) from Mouser but maybe I just dreamt it. Looking forward to it. What's the deal here, it looks like laser into powdercoat and then gold backfilled? Lovely looking pedal and the gold switch with creme knobs looks very classy.

Thank you for the compliment! Actually, the finish started with scuffing the pedal diagonally to achieve a consistent shine with a 400 grit wet sand. Degreased with Naptha and washed with water. Then, three light coats of Krylon Fusion 'Gloss Red Plum', let cure for four days. Then laser-etched just to the point of exposing the shine, using an EzCAD type program and my friend's very expensive etching machine. Last, three light coats of Krylon Fusion 'Clear Gloss.' The 'gold' appearance is my work bench warm white spotlights. I have those mixed with sunlight led lights for fine work and just turned off the latter for a warmer pic.
 
Interested in building this myself, looking for more of a character compressor like an 1176, rather than squeaky clean. Did the burr browns clean it up? Is this a decent character compressor?
 
Interested in building this myself, looking for more of a character compressor like an 1176, rather than squeaky clean. Did the burr browns clean it up? Is this a decent character compressor?

It all depends on what 'character' you are looking for, but I am going to guess the answer is yes. It can do some of the chicken-pick'in squish that Ross compressors do. It can do the transparent 1176. I use it for making my guitar's tone bigger, by the settings on the first picture. I get transient dynamics, plus more sustain and 'lift' for quiet playing.

The primary audible advantage of using the Burr Brown ICs, is less compression white noise, which is an artifact of analog compressors. In other words - a lower noise floor. The 'feel' and tone are close to that of a good TL072: transparent and musical, without being a constipated HiFi tone.

Note that I rarely used compressors at live performances and now have it always on in the beginning of my signal chain on one of my pedal boards.
 
Built to PedalPCB spec (unusual for me). Having used many UREI 1176 compressors and being underwhelmed with traditional guitar compressors (yes, even my 1982 Ross that I kept for 34 years), this pedal hits what I want in a guitar / bass compressor: big, natural sustain, with a hint of country 'squish'!

View attachment 78475View attachment 78476View attachment 78477
That's pretty sweet looking. I didn't know that Wampler even released this let alone having a board from @Robert. And here I thought my compressor obsession was over....heh. Guess it's going in the cart for my next order!
 
It all depends on what 'character' you are looking for, but I am going to guess the answer is yes. It can do some of the chicken-pick'in squish that Ross compressors do. It can do the transparent 1176. I use it for making my guitar's tone bigger, by the settings on the first picture. I get transient dynamics, plus more sustain and 'lift' for quiet playing.

The primary audible advantage of using the Burr Brown ICs, is less compression white noise, which is an artifact of analog compressors. In other words - a lower noise floor. The 'feel' and tone are close to that of a good TL072: transparent and musical, without being a constipated HiFi tone.

Note that I rarely used compressors at live performances and now have it always on in the beginning of my signal chain on one of my pedal boards.
Thanks for the reply.

I am a bass player, when I record 99% of the time I run through an 1176 or or the Distressor. I would love one on my pedal board.
 
Is this at all comparable to studio style compressors? How low/high can you go with the attack and release times? I don't care much for dedicated guitar compressors/sustainers like the Dynacomp or whatever but I sometimes use regular studio compressor VSTs when reamping guitar tracks. Would be cool to get a similar amount of control over dynamics in analog pedal form.

Edit: I just watched a couple of demos of the Wampler original on YouTube. Seems promising. And in the cart it goes :)
 
Last edited:
Is this at all comparable to studio style compressors? How low/high can you go with the attack and release times? I don't care much for dedicated guitar compressors/sustainers like the Dynacomp or whatever but I sometimes use regular studio compressor VSTs when reamping guitar tracks. Would be cool to get a similar amount of control over dynamics in analog pedal form.

Edit: I just watched a couple of demos of the Wampler original on YouTube. Seems promising. And in the cart it goes :)

You will be happy with it.

I used a Urei (UA) 1176 and a Klark Technic 1176 religiously in my friend's recording studio, from about 1985 thru 1999. I also repaired the former once. The Wampler pedal is not an exact clone of that circuit, instead utilizing the essential circuits and gearing it to use on instruments. What is close to exact is the Attack (20–800 microseconds) and Release (50–1100 microseconds) times (both fast, as the original was designed to be a compressor-limiter).

The Urei uses +30vDC rail voltage and only used a single FET for the Compression (a.k.a.: 'threshold,' 'ratio,' 'squeeze,' etc.). It also has discrete transistors forming a push-pull output amplification, into a 30ohm to 600ohm, low distortion isolation transformer (which could and often was pushed lightly into harmonic distortion.

In brief, the Wampler has less headroom, will distort sooner, will have less wattage being delivered to the next component (another pedal, amp, interface, etc.) and due to not having an isolation transformer, will have the ultra-high frequencies rolling off faster than the Urei 1176. Perfect for guitar, bass, piano, keys, sax, horns, fiddles, and even vocals. The pedal would not have the same impact as the Urei 1176 on a multi-track mix or master. Not to say it wouldn't sound good in certain musical applications, jut not the same level of performance.

The 'Mix' control makes the instrument sound huge. With the mix set to 100%, I set the attack and release pretty fast and the compression to a just detectable squeeze then dial back in the transients backing down the mix from 100%. I often use this setting live as an 'always-on,' at the beginning of the pedal chain. Traditional compressors will add noise, especially when the drive pedals are engaged, and this pedal has a noticeably lower noise floor than that. I also run it on 18v when using a bass guitar, just to give it a little more headroom.

When you have it up and running, I'd like to hear your thoughts.
 
You will be happy with it.

I used a Urei (UA) 1176 and a Klark Technic 1176 religiously in my friend's recording studio, from about 1985 thru 1999. I also repaired the former once. The Wampler pedal is not an exact clone of that circuit, instead utilizing the essential circuits and gearing it to use on instruments. What is close to exact is the Attack (20–800 microseconds) and Release (50–1100 microseconds) times (both fast, as the original was designed to be a compressor-limiter).

The Urei uses +30vDC rail voltage and only used a single FET for the Compression (a.k.a.: 'threshold,' 'ratio,' 'squeeze,' etc.). It also has discrete transistors forming a push-pull output amplification, into a 30ohm to 600ohm, low distortion isolation transformer (which could and often was pushed lightly into harmonic distortion.

In brief, the Wampler has less headroom, will distort sooner, will have less wattage being delivered to the next component (another pedal, amp, interface, etc.) and due to not having an isolation transformer, will have the ultra-high frequencies rolling off faster than the Urei 1176. Perfect for guitar, bass, piano, keys, sax, horns, fiddles, and even vocals. The pedal would not have the same impact as the Urei 1176 on a multi-track mix or master. Not to say it wouldn't sound good in certain musical applications, jut not the same level of performance.

The 'Mix' control makes the instrument sound huge. With the mix set to 100%, I set the attack and release pretty fast and the compression to a just detectable squeeze then dial back in the transients backing down the mix from 100%. I often use this setting live as an 'always-on,' at the beginning of the pedal chain. Traditional compressors will add noise, especially when the drive pedals are engaged, and this pedal has a noticeably lower noise floor than that. I also run it on 18v when using a bass guitar, just to give it a little more headroom.

When you have it up and running, I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Good info! Seems like what I'm after. I'm just looking for an approximation of the level of tweakability you get with studio compressors for my guitar rig without having to go into a computer first. I currently don't own any rack mount/outboard compressors because I just don't have the space for it. I did however experiment with a cheap Behringer rack mount compressor years and years ago in front of a guitar amp. It did give me the level of control over the signal I was looking for but it was impractical due to its size. It also raised the noise floor considerably so it was kind of useless for high gain tones. Will definitely post a build report, share my thoughts and do a demo once it's built. Seems like I just got the last board because it now shows as sold out on the site. Lucky me! :D
 
I just finished building mine, and I'm not quite sure how to set the trim pot.

Is it for biasing the transistors?

Good advice from @Robert. It is a trim pot that fine-tunes Q1 to behave symmetrically, allowing or disallowing the audio signal to be sent to ground. If you adjust the trim pot to its extremes, it while sending tone generator into the pedal or a guitar, you will hear the compression cutting in and out.
 
So, I'm not able to get anywhere near 1.875Vdc on pin 1 of Q1. If I put the ground of the DMM on the chassis and the positive probe on pin 1 of Q1, I get from 0 Vdc to .720 Vdc through the range of the trim pot.

I'm confused.
 
So, I'm not able to get anywhere near 1.875Vdc on pin 1 of Q1. If I put the ground of the DMM on the chassis and the positive probe on pin 1 of Q1, I get from 0 Vdc to .720 Vdc through the range of the trim pot.

I'm confused.
Measure between pins 2 & 3 (Source and Gate), not gate to ground.
 
Back
Top