Acoustic Preamp Design - Preamp & EQ

Rpschultz13

Rpschultz13

Well-known member
In mid 2023 I started designing my own acoustic preamp, striving for similar functionality to the Grace Designs Alix. I was annoyed by how expensive good acoustic guitar preamp/EQ's are, thought I could make my own cheaper. I started with the preamp section of a Fishman loudbox, added a gain section and then used the ESP State Variable Filters to add:
  • Adjustable Notch/HPF (switch)
  • High and Low shelf filters
  • Sweepable Mid (hi/low switch) parametric filters
The 14 op amps run on +/- 15v (Alix runs at +/- 18v). It has 2 boards, the PS board has the 3DPT's and DC/DC converter, other board has the main circuit. I did extensive modeling in LT Spice for all the frequency stuff. I printed the first prototype boards in late 2023, put it together and found 5 design errors. Eventually I fixed all those but it still didn't work, I never could get sound to come out. I lost steam and gave up and started working on Q-tune.

Earlier this year (2025) I took my prototype in to Python workshop to show someone for fun (telling him I never got it to work), he turned the knobs and switches, etc, thought it was cool. Few weeks later I took it home and was going to try troubleshooting again... plugged it in and it WORKED! Evidently one of the switches was routed wrong on 1 side, but he put it in the direction that worked. Talk about luck.

Anyway, so I fixed the 6 different errors on the PCB and printed the next version this spring. I just finished putting it together. It works! I don't have the footswitches wired in yet, and I need to play through it for a while to see how useful the different sections are musically.

IMG_7268.jpg

IMG_7267.jpg

1754247912030.png

1754247933707.png
 
Last edited:
There's a lot going on in there! I'd be interested to know what your design process was: did you breadboard the whole thing, test it in functional blocks, or just go on theory and hope for the best?
 
Way too much to breadboard. In my experience breadboarding often brings more problems than it solves. To each their own, but I'd rather simulate and print (it's cheap), and then fix mistakes and re-print than spend a ton of time breadboarding. There are situations where breadboarding is useful, we did a lot of small circuit R&D breadboarding for Q-tune, then compared with simulations. But for PreQ, breadboarding didn't make a lot of sense to me. I spent a lot of time in LT Spice getting the frequency response I wanted and checking voltages, etc. But mostly went on theory and hoped for the best. All the errors (except the last one) were PCB layout errors, the last one was a schematic error.
 
There's definitely a level of circuit complexity past which breadboards become more a liability than an asset. That said, I don't think I've ever gone full simulation. With more complex circuits, I still end up breadboarding at least some of the functinal blocks.
 
Last edited:
Hate breadboarding, I inevitably wire things wrong and spend an hour just redoing it. I've had good success with PCB prints. And at the very least with PCB you're more confident that the error is design and not execution which means less places to check.
 
Feral Feline said:
I'm interested in a PreQ-PCB.
Click to expand...

My next steps:
1) fully evaluate its function, sound, etc. tweak values maybe. This might take a few months.
2) re-print PCBs fixing all the minor issues I’ve found so far and any improvements.
3) put together parts list and Tayda templates, etc.

Realistically, might be early next year before I get there.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top