Feral Feline
Well-known member
Thought I'd start a thread to share my layouts, get feedback on them, and hopefully have some fun.
This sub-forum seemed the logical place to knot the thread.
I use DIYLC for my perf-layouts (though I have Eagle) because I spent an inordinate amount of time learning how to use DIYLC and it's where I'm comfortable now — for the moment. Tried getting up to speed on Eagle a few times, but... maybe later.
I originally started doing perf layouts mainly because I wanted to build stuff that wasn't available on PCB and prefer perf to vero, another reason was I didn't think I had the skills or knowledge to lay out PCBs. However...
Now I'm getting back into perf layouts for some of those same original reasons, but also as a dojo to train up and prepare for laying out my own PCBs.
Ready or not here I come, PCB fabricators.
So, for the first thread-entry I've spent the last few days tinkering with a clean blend for @jrhevron and myself. Here's the first draught:
The perf above was put together based on the schematic in this PDF:
In turn, Fusion's based on Jubal81's Schooner.
Instigated to lay this one out by posts in this thread:
I chose to go for some added gain to the clean-blend, but haven't worked out the exact values yet. The PDF says
I don't quite get what a gain of "4" means. Four times the voltage? Increase of 4dB? What does this compare to?
Nucleon's designer mentioned the same thing in a DIYSB thread, username ROCKHORST:
Any advice on sorting out the clean's GAIN would be welcomed.
INVERSION
Another feature of the circuit in the PDF is it can be built to invert the phase of the wet-signal.
I thought it'd be more utilitarian to have both inverting and non-inverting available at the flip of a switch, so I worked that out.
I've included a mockup of the switch with the perf layout, 'cause it helped me determine whether or not it was feasible to switch between inverting/non-inverting so it might help others, too. That switch took some time to figure out, but as is usually the case it was more straightforward than I thought.
The main layout itself positions the two pots and switch such that it should fit a 3-knob PedalPCB template with a little wiggling.
One pot's legs are oriented vertically and the other's horizontally, to give better support to anchoring the perf and avoid possible strain on solder joints that all pot-legs on the same axis are susceptible to. Bonus: it's more compact than having the pots side by side.
The control layout would look something like this, with the bypass LED:
✹
That's about it, for now. Wasn't able to sleep last night, so once again posting half drunk from sleep-deprivation — I'll never learn.
I'm sure there will be errors in this post I'll have to fix later.
Thanks to Nucleon's Rutger Rockhorst for working up this clean-blend in the first place.
NEXT UP...
...I'll post a booffster: Just prior to the Nucleon Clean Blend, I mashed together Jerry Garcias Tiger Preamp with Mr Noir's Boosty Tigress.
This sub-forum seemed the logical place to knot the thread.
I use DIYLC for my perf-layouts (though I have Eagle) because I spent an inordinate amount of time learning how to use DIYLC and it's where I'm comfortable now — for the moment. Tried getting up to speed on Eagle a few times, but... maybe later.
I originally started doing perf layouts mainly because I wanted to build stuff that wasn't available on PCB and prefer perf to vero, another reason was I didn't think I had the skills or knowledge to lay out PCBs. However...
Now I'm getting back into perf layouts for some of those same original reasons, but also as a dojo to train up and prepare for laying out my own PCBs.
Ready or not here I come, PCB fabricators.
So, for the first thread-entry I've spent the last few days tinkering with a clean blend for @jrhevron and myself. Here's the first draught:
The perf above was put together based on the schematic in this PDF:
In turn, Fusion's based on Jubal81's Schooner.
Instigated to lay this one out by posts in this thread:
Since there have been a couple of threads on the topic of "I want to do this pedal but with a clean blend" and "I want to blend two circuits" and I don't want to repeat myself all the time, here is a bit about clean blends. I have zero electronics background, am a self-taught pedal nerd and won't be able to answer ALL technical questions they arise. I am more of a f*ck-around-and-figure-it-out guy who loves to keep things reasonably simple, but also loves if things are engineered nicely.
So that being said, this is how to blend...
1. Buff n Blend
The...
So that being said, this is how to blend...
1. Buff n Blend
The...
- jesuscrisp
- Replies: 11
- Forum: The Test Kitchen
I chose to go for some added gain to the clean-blend, but haven't worked out the exact values yet. The PDF says
"If the effect you’re blending is running above unity signal levels, it can be difficult to blend in the clean signal in a desired ratio. To remedy this you can boost the cleans by adjusting R2 and R3. The gain is calculated as . So R2 = R3 = 47kΩ gives a (voltage) gain of 2. Change R2 to 22kΩ will give gain of roughly 4."
I don't quite get what a gain of "4" means. Four times the voltage? Increase of 4dB? What does this compare to?
Nucleon's designer mentioned the same thing in a DIYSB thread, username ROCKHORST:
Idea for a clean blend circuit - feedback wanted - Page 2
Idea for a clean blend circuit - feedback wanted - Page 2
www.diystompboxes.com
Any advice on sorting out the clean's GAIN would be welcomed.
INVERSION
Another feature of the circuit in the PDF is it can be built to invert the phase of the wet-signal.
I thought it'd be more utilitarian to have both inverting and non-inverting available at the flip of a switch, so I worked that out.
I've included a mockup of the switch with the perf layout, 'cause it helped me determine whether or not it was feasible to switch between inverting/non-inverting so it might help others, too. That switch took some time to figure out, but as is usually the case it was more straightforward than I thought.
The main layout itself positions the two pots and switch such that it should fit a 3-knob PedalPCB template with a little wiggling.
One pot's legs are oriented vertically and the other's horizontally, to give better support to anchoring the perf and avoid possible strain on solder joints that all pot-legs on the same axis are susceptible to. Bonus: it's more compact than having the pots side by side.
The control layout would look something like this, with the bypass LED:
✹
That's about it, for now. Wasn't able to sleep last night, so once again posting half drunk from sleep-deprivation — I'll never learn.
I'm sure there will be errors in this post I'll have to fix later.
Thanks to Nucleon's Rutger Rockhorst for working up this clean-blend in the first place.
NEXT UP...
...I'll post a booffster: Just prior to the Nucleon Clean Blend, I mashed together Jerry Garcias Tiger Preamp with Mr Noir's Boosty Tigress.