Strymon phaser , what do you think?

NickC

Well-known member

if it had cost a third of what it costs I would have taken it :ROFLMAO:
 

Attachments

  • STRCHPEZELZAH.jpg
    STRCHPEZELZAH.jpg
    815.6 KB · Views: 7
It’s cool, but aside from the very cool barber/shepherd waveform, I’d say it’s relatively underwhelming. I mean… strymon is has the technology and the minds to do some really spectacular new features and ideas for a phaser, and instead they come up with a box with two pretty basic phasers with just a few bells and whistles to make it just slightly unique.
It seems like a severe underutilization of the technology— everything aside from the barber waveform could be very easily done in the fully analog domain at 1/3 the price point using 50 year old technology.
 
Strymon stuff is really cool. And it’s great you can midi the mini pedals. But at that price point I think I’d take a Line6 HX over a bunch of Strymon pedals.
 
I've never owned a phaser and I'm afraid Strymon haven't made me want to buy my first! I don't have a use for one. I don't need chorus or flanging either.
 
I've never owned a phaser and I'm afraid Strymon haven't made me want to buy my first! I don't have a use for one. I don't need chorus or flanging either.
Give modulation a chance. If you use it sparingly, it can add some interesting movement without completely taking over your sound.
 
I’m thinking they may’ve messed up with the marketing here. They’re leaning really heavily into “PHASER” and vintage 4- and 6-stage analog reference points. They show it working as a stereo chorus, ersatz flanger, and limited envelope filter in addition to the phaser. (Aside: The barber pole / shepard tone mode is unique and pretty interesting.) This isn’t nearly a comprehensive, mega phaser machine. And the added mod effects are rather limited, but the copy suggests these are the selling point (especially the VOICE knob). I wouldn’t imagine most strymon customers know/care about the analog basis for phasers (or other mod effects), why focus just on the phaser there? The two sides are rather bog standard. I guess ‘multidimensional’ is doing the lifting here, but they probably should’ve focused more on modulation more generally.
 
Back
Top