What’s on *YOUR* workbench?

Well, I was anticipating a Deeptronic group buy project to show up. Instead, my Tayda order with parts to finish the multitude of projects that are missing 2-3 parts arrived. Huzzah.
 
1000016285.jpg 1000016286.jpg 1000016287.jpg
Finished clear coating this waterside decal on new bass build. I did one day of headstock prep, one day of decal application and drying, and three days of spraying and sanding (3 coats each day). I used Stew Macs Color Tone clear nitro. Really proud of how it came out! You can only see a faint outline from one very specific angle.
 
got a headlining show next month with a couple interstate bands that are gonna need to use our backline.
normally I just my SLO clone(s), but for these sort of backline share scenarios it's better to have something ppl are more familiar with.

so I thought it'd be a good idea to give my Peavey 6534+ a service + preventative maintenance etc.

View attachment 88683

View attachment 88684
after this one the other guitarist's 6505 is next, and boy howdy that thing has had a hard life.

really hoping it doesn't that horrible shitty grey ribbon cable stuff that the 5150s have...
Peavey update:
so i did the thing.
most won't give a shit about some old 'chugga chugga' amps but i'm excited so whatever

after a couple mods/upgrades, reflowed every single joint, filled up the open tracks, and cleaned the shit out of it:
IMG_6967.jpeg

treated the pots, header pins/connectors, and tube socket pins with deoxit d5.
IMG_6997.jpeg

mods:

5150ii/6505+/6534+ lead channel --> converted to 5150 / 6505 lead channel.

(C17) 470pF --> 470K+2.2n
IMG_6965.jpeg

(C2) 1n --> 22n
IMG_6961.jpeg
that's all there is to it.

the mk II lead channel just isn't as beefy.
i have a mid-boosting/bass-cutting overdrive always on, so the fatter coupling caps of the OG/mk I lead channel just works/sounds a lot better to my ears.
so this (lead channel) is now essentially a 5150 with EL34 power section.

other upgrades:
- replaced carbon film 68K input resistor with a spare vishay 1W metal film
IMG_6963.jpeg

- 1M input pulldown resistor - carbon film replaced with 1/2W metal film 1M
IMG_6966.jpeg

spent about 3 mins to confirm i didn't fuck up:
IMG_6970.jpeg
sounds good, yet to to actually properly investigate...

....cos I immediately started work on the next one - Peavey 6505: (other guitarists)
IMG_6972.jpeg

only x1 shitty ribbon cable.
built Apr-2007.
IMG_6973.jpeg

- this one left stock, but with the same input resistor (x2) upgrades, joints reflowed, deoxit treatment, etc.
- for some obscure reason, x1 half of the board was coated in some sort of a lacquer.

it became a disaster when i tried to clean it with IPA.
no matter what i did it kept drying like some prick had poured ajax cream cleanser all over it (tonnes of white residue).
eventually i figured out a great method and got rid of it all.
IMG_6990.jpeg

also - if anyone ever tries to tell you a 5150 is superior/different to a 6505:
IMG_6982.jpeg
SAME FUCKEN BOARD SINCE 1991.
 
Finally fixing up the Germanium 4 Big Muff I bought that had a faulty overdrive side. Desoldered the NKT275's, and although it's possible I damaged them while desoldering (which wasn't too bad although as usual I do hate it), one of them reads as a diode and the other has a hFE of 3.85 on the TC1 (although at 4V, need to charge it up). I put in sockets so I can test other transistors there, although I just realized they're PNP... But I do have some germaniums available (no silicon PNP I don't think, not 100% sure).

On the negative side, it was a huge fucking hassle to get the board out of the box and I'm dreading putting it back, I melted some of the knobs while taking them out because those were also a huge pain, and I soldered one of the socket on the wrong side of the board. Buuut if I get it back together and it's working, I'll still count it as a victory.

Edit:

Well it's all boxed up and everything still works great, so it's a huge success! Also the mini chickenhead knobs I used as replacements for the partially melted ones look cute as fuck (plus they show which side is not stock), so all in all a success. I suspect it might have slightly more gain now on the OD side, but can't say for sure since I only tested it when it was broken. It's still not a ton of gain, but it works nicely for me for anything except the doom/stoner metal stuff, I think.
DSC_3823.JPG
 
Last edited:
Peavey update:
so i did the thing.
most won't give a shit about some old 'chugga chugga' amps but i'm excited so whatever

after a couple mods/upgrades, reflowed every single joint, filled up the open tracks, and cleaned the shit out of it:
View attachment 89544

treated the pots, header pins/connectors, and tube socket pins with deoxit d5.
View attachment 89553

mods:

5150ii/6505+/6534+ lead channel --> converted to 5150 / 6505 lead channel.

(C17) 470pF --> 470K+2.2n
View attachment 89547

(C2) 1n --> 22n
View attachment 89555
that's all there is to it.

the mk II lead channel just isn't as beefy.
i have a mid-boosting/bass-cutting overdrive always on, so the fatter coupling caps of the OG/mk I lead channel just works/sounds a lot better to my ears.
so this (lead channel) is now essentially a 5150 with EL34 power section.

other upgrades:
- replaced carbon film 68K input resistor with a spare vishay 1W metal film
View attachment 89549

- 1M input pulldown resistor - carbon film replaced with 1/2W metal film 1M
View attachment 89548

spent about 3 mins to confirm i didn't fuck up:
View attachment 89546
sounds good, yet to to actually properly investigate...

....cos I immediately started work on the next one - Peavey 6505: (other guitarists)
View attachment 89551

only x1 shitty ribbon cable.
built Apr-2007.
View attachment 89550

- this one left stock, but with the same input resistor (x2) upgrades, joints reflowed, deoxit treatment, etc.
- for some obscure reason, x1 half of the board was coated in some sort of a lacquer.

it became a disaster when i tried to clean it with IPA.
no matter what i did it kept drying like some prick had poured ajax cream cleanser all over it (tonnes of white residue).
eventually i figured out a great method and got rid of it all.
View attachment 89552

also - if anyone ever tries to tell you a 5150 is superior/different to a 6505:
View attachment 89554
SAME FUCKEN BOARD SINCE 1991.
Good stuff. I got the 6505+ as well and put the 6505 spec components on external switches. You're missing just one thing, the treble cap in the tone stack of the 6505 is 570pF (470pF+100pF in parallel). 390pF works very well for a more scooped tone as well. I put all three on a DPDT on-on-on.
 
Good stuff. I got the 6505+ as well and put the 6505 spec components on external switches. You're missing just one thing, the treble cap in the tone stack of the 6505 is 570pF (470pF+100pF in parallel). 390pF works very well for a more scooped tone as well. I put all three on a DPDT on-on-on.
ahhh yep.. good call.

6505+
1738190325670.png
6505
1738190641911.png
i didn't even really look at these tbh 😅

so it's simply a matter of 470pf vs. 570pf into the treble pot......

reckon i might just pick out a 560pF cap and drop one in 🤙
 
The stamp glued to a piece of plexiglass, template to help with positioning glued to the enclosure. And hold your breath while pressing :)
Rubber stamp, Stazon ink.
That’s really cool. Maybe I should try that. Where did you get the stamps?

Edit: do you have to protect the ink after stamping?
 
That’s really cool. Maybe I should try that. Where did you get the stamps?

Edit: do you have to protect the ink after stamping?
Stazon ink is quite resistant to abrasion but probably some protective layer wouldn't hurt. I don't put anything on top.

There are many companies that laser engrave stamps. You make a design (illustrator, inkscape) -> text to curves -> export to pdf. Should be enough.
1738246701101.png
 
I haven't tried any other brands, only Stazon. It's pretty good.
This resistance to rubbing is both an advantage and a disadvantage. If something goes wrong, it's very difficult to remove the ink without leaving a mark. When stamping, I always have a cotton pad with isopropyl alcohol at hand and I can start working immediately. But even that doesn't guarantee success. Sometimes a faint "ghost image" of the text remains, and sometimes - also faintly visible - a streak of ink. Here I mean smooth surfaces. Because with a texture like fine sand, for example, it's a big problem.
 
Back
Top