Why cant the tap functions be handled by an independent PIC then the PIC feeds PWM to the FV-1. That will easy the processing load of the FV-1. Honestly everyone is way over charging for Tap functions for the PT2399. PIC programing is easy and Tap function is simple math.The FV-1 code for tap tempo eats up a majority of your instructions that you would use for the actual delay effect..... you can do it, but then you're a bit limited in what you can do in terms of the actual effect. The Daydream would be an absolute no go, unfortunately.
I do have plans for a tap tempo module for the FV-1, but it's been on the back burner for some time now... eventually......
Why cant the tap functions be handled by an independent PIC then the PIC feeds PWM to the FV-1. That will easy the processing load of the FV-1. Honestly everyone is way over charging for Tap functions for the PT2399. PIC programing is easy and Tap function is simple math.