King of Tone: what would you do?

you came up on the wait list. you would...

  • buy it for yourself with specs you want

    Votes: 11 23.4%
  • buy it and flip it

    Votes: 21 44.7%
  • nothing

    Votes: 9 19.1%
  • something else- explain in the comments

    Votes: 6 12.8%

  • Total voters
    47
Chase Bliss is hating on the people who buy their pedals by convincing them to buy a $400 clone with features most people are never going to use. My quip at the end is a reference to that.

The pedal doesn't exist in a vacuum and you can't analyze it as such. It's always going to have the hype attached to it. There are too many other KoT style pedals - the only reason most people buy this one is the hype.

Please, if you're going to discuss feelings, try to do so without personal insults.
$400 for a clone with a lot of extra features is reasonable IMO. It's much better than $300 for the same pedal from Analogman without those features, if we are going there. The only reason people buy the original is hype - this one actually has a lot of extras compared to most clones.

I didn't intend to insult you personally and I can see how it reads like that, and I apologize for that. But I feel like the argument I meant to convey is still pretty valid.

The assumption that it's overpriced and overhyped because the features are unnecessary (and thus the buyer is overpaying) hinges on people not using those features - and you literally said that you wouldn't use them. But that doesn't mean other people don't use them, and assuming they wouldn't in my opinion comes from a self centered place. So if you assume other people don't use them because you don't use them, then that is in my opinion self-centered.
 
I can't feature paying retail for something that ugly

All hate aside, I think it's kinda cool that they gave the nod towards the original ... in their defense, they didn't have a lot to work with cosmetically regardless of which direction they went.

But yeah.... there's something up with those knobs.... they look 3D printed or something...
1760038891516.png
 
All hate aside, I think it's kinda cool that they gave the nod towards the original ... in their defense, they didn't have a lot to work with cosmetically regardless of which direction they went.

But yeah.... there's something up with those knobs.... they look 3D printed or something...
View attachment 104283
Oh yeah the original is no work of art, and yeah mostly a knob change away from tolerable
 
$400 for a clone with a lot of extra features is reasonable IMO. It's much better than $300 for the same pedal from Analogman without those features, if we are going there. The only reason people buy the original is hype - this one actually has a lot of extras compared to most clones.
To hash this out a little further:

The "base" King of Tone is now up to $335 with no options.
Chase Bliss Brothers AM is $400 w/ free shipping. (I can't remember if AM charges shipping or not either)

Brothers AM has the "high gain" option for both sides as part of its external dip switches.
On the KoT, that's $10 per side. So we're at $355.

Brothers AM has a mode switch (OD/Dist/Boost) for both sides.
On the KoT, it's $50 for an external mode toggle and I believe it's only offered on one side. So you are at $405 and not quite the same functionality already.

Brothers AM also has what's supposed to be "based on" Analogman's Beano Boost built in. It's not exactly the same (SI vs GE I believe) but a regular Beano Boost is $215 from Analogman. Like I said, not *exactly* the same thing here, but just for sake of exercise...you would be at $620 now.

Personally you would never catch ME paying $400 for a Brothers AM, but like I said above too - I also didn't feel like the "real" KoT was an overdrive that was worth $300 either, and dollar for dollar if I WERE going to spend that kind of coin on one OD, I think the Brothers AM makes a lot more sense from a pure value/functionality standpoint. IMO the real KoT is more suited as an "investment piece" if we're looking at prices
 
Here's maybe a stupid question that just came to mind: What's the point of having an order toggle for what is seemingly two identical sides? Like...if you want high gain into low gain, set the knobs that way....if you want low gain into high gain, just reverse the knobs on each side...? I guess a toggle is more convenient but maybe I'm missing something else lol
 
$400 for a clone with a lot of extra features is reasonable IMO. It's much better than $300 for the same pedal from Analogman without those features, if we are going there. The only reason people buy the original is hype - this one actually has a lot of extras compared to most clones.

I didn't intend to insult you personally and I can see how it reads like that, and I apologize for that. But I feel like the argument I meant to convey is still pretty valid.

The assumption that it's overpriced and overhyped because the features are unnecessary (and thus the buyer is overpaying) hinges on people not using those features - and you literally said that you wouldn't use them. But that doesn't mean other people don't use them, and assuming they wouldn't in my opinion comes from a self centered place. So if you assume other people don't use them because you don't use them, then that is in my opinion self-centered.
Thank you for explaining that you meant your post in a different way.

There are two points of my argument. First, the pedal has features that are going to be unused by most of the people who purchase the pedal. Second, Chase Bliss has hyped the pedal up such that people believe it's going to have a better sound than any of the other clones available for half the price. It's important not to conflate these two.

When I said I don't care about midi because I'm playing ac/dc, that is a metaphor for the greater collective of guitar players whose boards I've seen, most of which do not utilize midi. It just so happens that I do not either. I am a sample representative of the majority of guitar players in this sense, and I used myself in the metaphor because when writing it is best to speak from one's own voice.

In your post you justify one overpriced pedal by comparing it to another, saying $400 isn't so bad compared to $300. This is a false comparison because the Analogman pedal isn't $300, it's $335 and a 6 year waiting list, or double to triple that on ebay. This is the main appeal of the Bros AM - it's a "legit" clone you can buy now for less than the effective price of the original.

But what makes something legit? Is it the fact that you know Chase Bliss engineered it correctly? But wait, we all build pedals on this forum, so don't you trust your own building prowess enough to know you can build a pedal just as good as the Analogman for $45?

Ok, but how about the regular guitar player who can't build pedals?

Well first, they aren't my intended audience, so we are really talking about two different points of view: How we view affordability of pedals, and how the average guitar play views the affordability of pedals. Or in other words, practice vs theory, respectively, considering the setting.

We know as much as anyone that the non-pedal-builder guitar player can go with any of the more affordable clones out there and still get a good sound; we're not using special diodes and magical capacitors and still our pedals sound great! But how does the non-builder know it's really going to be a good sound, or that the pedal is made correctly? They have to rely on branding. Branding is - at its heart - someone assuring you their product is good because their overall reputation is good. But it's very important to recognize that this exists because the buyer does not possess specialized knowledge about the product - and as such is in a vulnerable position.

This is the crux of my original post - regular people are being preyed on by companies that use hype to sell pedals to people who don't know any better. It's sales 101. I don't believe the pedal itself is bad, but CB is exploiting people who don't know any better by hyping their pedal, which is very bad.

If you have a setup where you use MIDI and want a KoT, then it makes sense to buy one. But if you don't, then it's a waste of money. But that's not the point I was making. My overall take is that companies are by their nature going to pursue their own self interest of selling their product and increasing their bottom line, rather than taking the more ethical position of teaching people to use their own ears and try things out for themselves. This is generally accepted and we deal with it because in the big picture it means we can have nice things. But the CB Bros AM was just a very obvious cash grab and it's hard to respect it.
 
Thank you for explaining that you meant your post in a different way.

There are two points of my argument. First, the pedal has features that are going to be unused by most of the people who purchase the pedal. Second, Chase Bliss has hyped the pedal up such that people believe it's going to have a better sound than any of the other clones available for half the price. It's important not to conflate these two.

When I said I don't care about midi because I'm playing ac/dc, that is a metaphor for the greater collective of guitar players whose boards I've seen, most of which do not utilize midi. It just so happens that I do not either. I am a sample representative of the majority of guitar players in this sense, and I used myself in the metaphor because when writing it is best to speak from one's own voice.

In your post you justify one overpriced pedal by comparing it to another, saying $400 isn't so bad compared to $300. This is a false comparison because the Analogman pedal isn't $300, it's $335 and a 6 year waiting list, or double to triple that on ebay. This is the main appeal of the Bros AM - it's a "legit" clone you can buy now for less than the effective price of the original.

But what makes something legit? Is it the fact that you know Chase Bliss engineered it correctly? But wait, we all build pedals on this forum, so don't you trust your own building prowess enough to know you can build a pedal just as good as the Analogman for $45?

Ok, but how about the regular guitar player who can't build pedals?

Well first, they aren't my intended audience, so we are really talking about two different points of view: How we view affordability of pedals, and how the average guitar play views the affordability of pedals. Or in other words, practice vs theory, respectively, considering the setting.

We know as much as anyone that the non-pedal-builder guitar player can go with any of the more affordable clones out there and still get a good sound; we're not using special diodes and magical capacitors and still our pedals sound great! But how does the non-builder know it's really going to be a good sound, or that the pedal is made correctly? They have to rely on branding. Branding is - at its heart - someone assuring you their product is good because their overall reputation is good. But it's very important to recognize that this exists because the buyer does not possess specialized knowledge about the product - and as such is in a vulnerable position.

This is the crux of my original post - regular people are being preyed on by companies that use hype to sell pedals to people who don't know any better. It's sales 101. I don't believe the pedal itself is bad, but CB is exploiting people who don't know any better by hyping their pedal, which is very bad.

If you have a setup where you use MIDI and want a KoT, then it makes sense to buy one. But if you don't, then it's a waste of money. But that's not the point I was making. My overall take is that companies are by their nature going to pursue their own self interest of selling their product and increasing their bottom line, rather than taking the more ethical position of teaching people to use their own ears and try things out for themselves. This is generally accepted and we deal with it because in the big picture it means we can have nice things. But the CB Bros AM was just a very obvious cash grab and it's hard to respect it.
IMG_2712.gif
 
To hash this out a little further:

The "base" King of Tone is now up to $335 with no options.
Chase Bliss Brothers AM is $400 w/ free shipping. (I can't remember if AM charges shipping or not either)

Brothers AM has the "high gain" option for both sides as part of its external dip switches.
On the KoT, that's $10 per side. So we're at $355.

Brothers AM has a mode switch (OD/Dist/Boost) for both sides.
On the KoT, it's $50 for an external mode toggle and I believe it's only offered on one side. So you are at $405 and not quite the same functionality already.

Brothers AM also has what's supposed to be "based on" Analogman's Beano Boost built in. It's not exactly the same (SI vs GE I believe) but a regular Beano Boost is $215 from Analogman. Like I said, not *exactly* the same thing here, but just for sake of exercise...you would be at $620 now.

Personally you would never catch ME paying $400 for a Brothers AM, but like I said above too - I also didn't feel like the "real" KoT was an overdrive that was worth $300 either, and dollar for dollar if I WERE going to spend that kind of coin on one OD, I think the Brothers AM makes a lot more sense from a pure value/functionality standpoint. IMO the real KoT is more suited as an "investment piece" if we're looking at prices
Even disregarding that the AM is overpriced, the Coppersound Foxcatcher for example is $250 and it seems to be a Bluesbreaker and a Boost. So $150 more and you get an another channel, plus all the MIDI, CV/expression and momentary functions. Of course if you compare it to a DIY or Demon FX KoT clone, it's bad value, but compared to most pedal companies... I don't think it's particularly egregious at all.
 
Let's face it I'm not buying a KOT

Not even out of spite? A spite purchase would be Awersum!






I LIKE IT! There, I said it.




1759927241964-png.104183



I'd replace all the toggles with stubbies and have them mounted as low as possible though.
I'd also ditch the little crowns, scratch off or sticker-over the "Throne of Tone".
Swap out the knobs for some silvery ones.
Maybe replace a few caps to make it more bass-friendly, or better still, put in a couple of heavily modded Bazz-Fusses...
I'd have to hammer flat the Circled-WA logo, too, but... yeah, I like it.
 
The way I see it, the Chase Bliss pedals have two primary use cases. Sitting on the floor and messing around with all the settings, or advanced control via MIDI. It’s really more of a specialized DSP unit with a single program installed, built into an interface that resembles a guitar pedal.
 
Back
Top