Bricksnbeatles
Member known well
What mods are most worthwhile in your opinions? I've been looking for a cool pt2399 based effect to build for my 23rd birthday next month, and last night I settled on the Chalumeau.
First off is the matter of gain- If I understand correctly, the gain of the 386 in the circuit is 200, due to pins 1 and 8 being tied directly together. that should mean that c2 and r2 are completely redundant in this circuit, as they'll only set the gain if pins 1 and 8 aren't shorted together. c2 and r2 should give the gain of the non-fuzz version of the Clari(not) if you cut the trace between pins 1 and 8. of course, you could always cut the trace, populate r2 and c2, and connect a spst between pins 1 and 8 if you want both versions of the circuit, but why not take this in a different direction and just do a gain pot? If we cut the trace between pins 1 and 2, and then also leave c2 and r2 unpopulated, then we should be able to wire up a 1KΩ pot between pins 1 and 8 for a continuously variable gain between (I think, I'm doing mental math rn) 40 and 200. any thoughts or corrections here? I haven't double checked my calculations yet...
Next is the mater of delay feedback. more on that soon...
				
			First off is the matter of gain- If I understand correctly, the gain of the 386 in the circuit is 200, due to pins 1 and 8 being tied directly together. that should mean that c2 and r2 are completely redundant in this circuit, as they'll only set the gain if pins 1 and 8 aren't shorted together. c2 and r2 should give the gain of the non-fuzz version of the Clari(not) if you cut the trace between pins 1 and 8. of course, you could always cut the trace, populate r2 and c2, and connect a spst between pins 1 and 8 if you want both versions of the circuit, but why not take this in a different direction and just do a gain pot? If we cut the trace between pins 1 and 2, and then also leave c2 and r2 unpopulated, then we should be able to wire up a 1KΩ pot between pins 1 and 8 for a continuously variable gain between (I think, I'm doing mental math rn) 40 and 200. any thoughts or corrections here? I haven't double checked my calculations yet...
Next is the mater of delay feedback. more on that soon...
 
	 
 
		 
 
		 (plus with the modulation turned mostly down, it should be marginally normal)
 (plus with the modulation turned mostly down, it should be marginally normal) )
) 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
 
		