Well said. There is a lot said here…multiple justifications: tone, circuit, sound.So for me, in the broadest of terms, distortion is “tighter/clean cut with sharp scissors” tone whereas a fuzz is like a “looser/frayed, jagged edge” tone. From a topology stand point (with a few exceptions) fuzzes seemed to be more transistor based with one transistor pushing the next into over saturation with or without diodes. A distortion seems to always be primarily IC based with diodes handling the clipping. Based on that, I believe a Big Muff to be a fuzz.
Fripp got a muff to sound the same as a Buzzaround. A Buzzaround is essentially a Tonebender MK3. A Supa Tonebender is essentially a muff sans one set of diodes. Tonebenders are the best fuzzes. Anything that shares a name with a Tonebender, even if it has nothing to do with one of the Tonebender circuits, is inherently a fuzz. Therefore muffs are fuzz by proxyAll I know is that The Big Muff is not a fuzz and I’ll fight to the death, Spock vs. Kirk style, with anyone who disagrees.
Is this the "Is a hotdog a sandwich?" of the guitar effect world?
It really is one of those things which is difficult to define "but I know it when I hear it"!
I agree wid da yout“Objection Ya Honah.”
“Sustained.”
“If it pleases the court Ya Honah, I’ll have the jury note that @Bricksnbeatles circuitous rambling is a mere distraction from the main discussion here: a Big Muff is most certainly not a fuzz. Keep n mind, the very soul of distortion is at stake here.”
I mean that’s essentially what the garnet herzog unit was, and if you listen to No Time by the guess who, there’s no denying that the Herzog was a fuzz unitIf a muff is a fuzz… and my fender 5f1 is an amp… and crank the the amp to the max and it sounds like a muff… does that make the amp a fuzz?