jeffwhitfield
Well-known member
True, true. I think the only way to really know how one DIY pedal stacks up against an original is to use a spectrometer and measure the frequency response and such. Even then, there are elements that can't really be measured.The only caveat here would be this: Many of us don’t compare them to the originals.
It’s fine to say your Klone blows away a real Klon if you have AB’d them. Hell, it’s fine to say you THINK your Klone blows away a real Klon even if you haven’t. As long as we are all on the same page about the subjective nature of tone, we can say whatever we want about DIY vs. the real thing.
Now, I’m not a mojo guy so I wouldn’t want to be misconstrued as being such, but there have been times when I’ve kept the commercial version of a pedal because, try as I may, that cheaper version I built didn’t sound the same.
You are right in the theoretical sense though: There’s nothing magical about circuit building and oftentimes there is only a thin layer of bullshit between that $200 pedal and the one you make in your basement for $40.
And you're right about the "thin layer of bullshit". That's definitely the case with lower priced pedals. But with something like a Klon or a KoT, that thin layer quickly turns into a thicker one in no time flat. The thing I argue is that with most guitar sounds you don't necessarily hear them much by themselves. They're usually mixed in with other things. At that point, can you really discern a real Klon from a well designed Klone? Or a real KoT from a good copy? I tend to think not.
The differences are largely subjective. I think we tend to hear things that aren't really there. Or, at the very least, get peace of mind knowing that we have an original as opposed to a copy...which in our mind is somehow inferior to the original. One is not really better than the other. It's all in the (err) "ear of the beholder".