Robert Reverse Engineer Nov 20, 2023 #4 Scratch that, it's the standard 1962, not my trace, and I have doubts that it's 100% accurate. I'm going to keep looking because I know damned good and well I had one of these on the bench a few years ago.
Scratch that, it's the standard 1962, not my trace, and I have doubts that it's 100% accurate. I'm going to keep looking because I know damned good and well I had one of these on the bench a few years ago.
