DD-200 was my first instinct, but I read that hitting the tap tempo sometimes switches it to loop mode? That sounds like a nightmare in a live setting. Any experience with that?I know you said you already use the DD-3 and the DD-7 but I can really recommend the DD-200. It's everything I could wish for in a delay. Tap tempo, 128 presets, 12 different delay types and a built in LED display that can either show you the time or the BPM.
Hm. I had the pedal for about two years and I don't recall this ever happening to me on accident. I think there is a way to turn of the looper completely AFAIK.Thanks peeps! I'm going to check these out.
DD-200 was my first instinct, but I read that hitting the tap tempo sometimes switches it to loop mode? That sounds like a nightmare in a live setting. Any experience with that?
For that matter, IMO the Timefactor still holds up awfully well and can be found for pretty dang cheap these days.The UI is somewhat confounding but the Eventide Rose is the pinnacle of digital delay technology.
I always keep my eye on Reverb for reasonably priced ones. Sometimes people really take the biscuit on the price of them, but sometimes they can be found for ~150 euros.For that matter, IMO the Timefactor still holds up awfully well and can be found for pretty dang cheap these days.
Interesting. Have you played a Flashback? Seems like a lot of the features from the Nova ended up there but in a more mass market format.Nova Delay is highly recommended.
I'm almost 100% certain they're using different generations of DSPs and algos. Very different sound either way. The nova kind of sounds like what I think of when I think digital delay, other than the DD3, of course.Interesting. Have you played a Flashback? Seems like a lot of the features from the Nova ended up there but in a more mass market format.
My mate got one back before everything increased in price. It's still good value for money, but back then it was almost a no brainer for someone who had no access to any delays and didn't know what they wanted. It sounds good and there are plenty of spaces for the toneprint stuff.The Flashback is excellent. But it does have a specific “sound” that you may or may not like.
I agree with the sentiment here. I hate having to use software to get the most out of my hardware. But I have to say I have basically never used the tone print app or the programmable memory slots. I tried once some of the existing presets and that was that. My point is that the pedal is totally usable without tone print, at least for my needs.My mate got one back before everything increased in price. It's still good value for money, but back then it was almost a no brainer for someone who had no access to any delays and didn't know what they wanted. It sounds good and there are plenty of spaces for the toneprint stuff.
But personally I think if you need an app to access features of a pedal, both the app and communication api should be open source and the chip they use to handle it should be non proprietary. Because all businesses WILL eventually go out of business or stop supporting older products, it's just a matter of if that happens before you stop playing guitar or not hahaha. Or you could get a situation where you need the app to access most of a pedals features, like with that newer UAFX speaker pedal, which is an objectively horseshit proposition. If I wanted a product where I needed to look at a screen to play my guitar, I'd use a VST.