The Week on the Breadboard: The Emperor of Tone

Chuck D. Bones

Circuit Wizard
I've been interested in the King of Tone for quite a while and finally got around to running sims and building a breadboard. The KoT is a pair of slightly modified Bluesbreakers in a single box. AnalogMan lowered the gain and added a charge pump for more headroom. He also added internal DIP switches for disconnecting the soft clipper and connecting a hard clipper. There is a Presence trimmer for increasing the brightness at the output. The two channels can be built the same, or there is a high-gain / low-gain option to make the channels different. The two channels are connected in series. The two stomp switches can engage either one, both or neither. Pretty cool design. By themselves, each channel has modest gain, around 40dB max. In series there is some serious gain and tone-shaping to be had. With the clippers disconnected, either channel can be used as a clean boost.

I saw some opportunities for mods. Here they are.
1. I kept the charge pump, but configured it to make ±9V in stead of +17V. Vref is now ground, which simplifies the biasing and removes the need for the output coupling capacitors. When we're building a circuit with opamps, it makes more sense to have split rails rather than one higher voltage rail and Vref.
2. I increased the gain of Channel 2 by cutting the impedances of C13, C14, R14 & R15 in half.
3. The Bluesbreaker and KoT roll-off the bass at the first stage to obtain the tone of a Marshall Hi-Treble channel. I added BOTTOM switches so one can add some or all of the bass back in, similar to bridging the inputs of a Marshall and turning up the Normal channel.
4. On channel 1, I moved the soft clipping DIP switch to the front panel and added an in-between selection. The soft clipping can be on, off or on but softer. This provides good control over the dynamics.
5. I replaced the hard clipping DIP switches with pots so we can blend in the hard clipping. It basically acts as a variable clean bleed on the hard clipper. This provides more control over the dynamics and tone.
6. I fiddled the impedance of the Presence filters a bit to make the presence trimpots more responsive.

Left side is the Rhythm channel (CH1), the right side is the Lead channel (CH2).
White knobs are VOLUME. Red knobs are TONE. Black knobs are HARD. Purple knob is LEAD DRIVE. Green knob is Rhythm DRIVE.
toggle switches L to R: LEAD BOTTOM, RHYTHM BOTTOM, RHYTHM SOFT CLIPPING.
The two trimpots are the Presence trims. I have them both set at 2 (9:00).
Emperor of Tone v0.4 breadboard 02.jpg

The schematic shows how the breadboard is configured, except I currently have NJM4580 dual opamps installed. I tried TL072s and they work well.

On the final version, I might add a SOFT CLIPPING switch to the Lead channel. So far, I don't think it's necessary. I'm considering adding an internal Volume Trim for the feed from the Rhythm channel to the Lead channel so that I can adjust how hard the Rhythm channel his the Lead channel without affecting the Rhythm volume.

Some of these mods are easily implemented on a Paragon board. The charge pump mod takes a little more effort, but should be doable. Most of these mods are also applicable to the Pauper. Many different clipping diode configurations are possible. The only caveat is that if we set the soft clipping threshold low, and the hard clipping threshold high, there is not enough signal to turn on the hard clippers. In the schematic below, if SOFT1 is switched to the right, D5 & D6 won't turn on. With SOFT1 in the center position (no soft clipping), it is possible to drive U1B to saturation if you dime DRIVE1 and have hot pickups or play aggressively.

Emperor of Tone v0.4.png
 
Interesting!
The extra headroom is useful if the soft clippers are turned off. The Prince of Tone does not contain a charge pump.

I saw Angela Pitrelli open for Cardinal Black (Chris Buck's band) a couple of months ago and last week saw her "sit in" with Zepparella. She had a Prince of Tone on her board set to OD mode. Between that and the Lion, she had a killer tone.

Angela Pitrilli's pedal board 02.jpg
 
If I'm not mistaken, the original King of Tone doesn't have a charge pump. I think that's something that diy pedal PCB makers started adding to the circuit.
View attachment 86139

Yep, that's correct. I included the charge pump since it could be easily omitted, not so easily added, and at the time it seemed everyone was running them at 18V. I'd probably remove it when I rework the layout again.

Imagine waiting 6 years and it shows up with the pots installed like that... Honestly, are we sure that construction is superior to Ly-Rock / DemonFX?
 
Imagine waiting 6 years and it shows up with the pots installed like that...

I noticed that too. Pretty sloppy.

I included the charge pump since it could be easily omitted, not so easily added, and at the time it seemed everyone was running them at 18V. I'd probably remove it when I rework the layout again.

When I first built the breadboard, it was a single channel and had a VOLTAGE switch to bypass the charge pump. I can see the attraction of running it on 18V (or ±9V). If you're going for dirty tone, 18V isn't needed. If you want clean or mostly clean on one of the channels, it helps to have the higher voltage.
 
To be fair, I should have compared it to the Prince of Tone instead of the Chinese knockoffs.

I had a Prince of Tone, it was built very well. I think if I were actually buying a King of Tone I'd prefer it to be made in China that level of build quality as well. Anyway, I've gotten a bit off topic here. :ROFLMAO:
 
I usually use 1N4148 + 1N400x when I need a series pair in a soft clipper. HamishR put me onto that combination and they sound good. an IR LED is a good sub for a series pair of Si diodes, nearly the same Vf.

I used red LEDs for the channel 1 hard clipper because I wanted more dynamics & volume. I used Si diodes for the channel 2 hard clipper because I wanted more compression in that channel. BA482s have a high Vf for a little more volume. If I didn't have those, I would have used 1N4007.

Lots of combinations will work, but I tried those and liked the sound.
 
I'm in the beginning stages of doing a layout for this, is tantalum superior to electrolytic in any of the capacitor positions C20-C24 in the power supply section?

***Edit to say I am working from the charge pump version's schematic.
 
Would there be a way of running/switching the two channels to run in parallel? A friend asked a few years back when I built the Paragon Mini for him.
 
Help me understand: what is the benefit of running the channels in parallel? Both channels do basically the same thing. Have you tried it?
 
I want to ask everyone about their preferences w.r.t. the charge pump.
1. No charge pump. Run it on 9V or 18V. That's the schematic in post #13.
2. Optional charge pump. The charge pump can be installed or not. Or you can put a voltage switch on the board. If the charge pump is not installed, then you have option #1.
3. Split rails. That's the schematic in post #1. Charge pump is mandatory. Must run on 9V only.

I don't have a strong preference one way or the other. They all have advantages & disadvantages and none of them are show-stoppers. #1 is the minimalist solution. #2 is the most flexible, but also has the highest parts count. #3 removes one electrolytic cap from the audio path in each channel (C6 & C16).
 
I'm about to build one, I'm honestly hesitating between 1 and 3. I like the simplicity of having no charge pump but might try the split rails... what's the advantage of running at +-9v ?
 
Back
Top