5F6/JTM45

(y) Wooohoo! Thx!

BTW, if I'm wanting to run my Part Acc into a power amp do I want to create a bypass toggle for the 220K resistor there, too?
 
(y) Wooohoo! Thx!

BTW, if I'm wanting to run my Part Acc into a power amp do I want to create a bypass toggle for the 220K resistor there, too?
Either that or a trimpot to attenuate it down to more pedal-useful levels. Trimpots are what I do in my "commercial" units.
 
A variable resistor, not a voltage divider. . . yes? A250K? Would my ears tell me the best output for a particular (Class D) power amp or do I want to hook it up to a oscilloscope and test for line level (3.5v p-p)?
 
A variable resistor, not a voltage divider. . . yes? A250K? Would my ears tell me the best output for a particular (Class D) power amp or do I want to hook it up to a oscilloscope and test for line level (3.5v p-p)?
I use 500k trimpots which are all linear taper, but yes hooked up as a potentiometer, not a variable resistor. Use your ears, they'll tell you what to do.
 
Curious. . . in noting the use of the fixed 220K in-line resistor in the Particle Accelerator why 500K and not 250K? Just a little extra "choice" in the matter?
 
Just seein' if you were paying attention ;) (ha ha). I see what you're saying. . . . Thx!! I assume I can pull that HV (full HV, not post plate resistor) from anywhere on the board?? I've since redesigned the layout so that an "HV buss" runs down one side of the board and a "GRD buss" runs down the other so the current flow of certain segments are flipped relative to conventional amp layouts. Given that the pots will lie directly against the backside of the board with the tubes flanking either side this seemed to make more sense than the conventional layout scheme. Seems to have more economical wiring, shorter runs.
 
Back
Top