Parentheses Fuzz Capacitor Question.

Diatrive

Member
I am building the Parentheses Fuzz pedal and I am confused.
Capacitor C22 is listed in the components as 1u but on the PCB it is a double box.
Anyone have any insight?
 
That they are. In general though aren't Xu caps electro? And Xn film caps? Not being snotty, just want to make sure I get it right.
Also there are many other 1u rounds caps in the build. ie C20 is 1u but electro and all there are 1n for film.

Other than the markings on the PCB how would you know that 'this' 1u is a film cap but all the others are electro even though both are 1u?
 
I think this points up an opportunity for improvement in the build docs: list the capacitor type. The Arachnid board does this in the case of the MLCC capacitors. Of course, we are always free to upgrade cap types as long as they will fit.

BTW, the dead giveaway for electrolytic capacitors is the polarity mark on the board.
 
I think this points up an opportunity for improvement in the build docs: list the capacitor type. The Arachnid board does this in the case of the MLCC capacitors. Of course, we are always free to upgrade cap types as long as they will fit.

BTW, the dead giveaway for electrolytic capacitors is the polarity mark on the board.
Hey, new here. One question: the build doc says MLCC...but this doesn't necessarily mean it has to be SMDs, right?
 
Mine are blue, I hope they sound ok! I used to think that MLCC stood for Multi Layer Chip Capacitor, but it's actually Multi Layer Ceramic Capacitor.
A couple things to note about MLCCs:
- MLCCs are good in switching power supplies and high-speed digital circuits where performance at megahertz frequencies is important. They are not particularly well suited for audio circuits.
- MLCCs rated for <100V have reliability issues because the ceramic layers are so thin that they can develop shorts.

For my first Arachnid (Octagon) build, I followed the BOM. The ones I got from DigiKey (FK24X7S2A105K) are rated for 100V. Next time around, I'll use film for all of the ones in the audio path.
 
That they are. In general though aren't Xu caps electro? And Xn film caps? Not being snotty, just want to make sure I get it right.
Also there are many other 1u rounds caps in the build. ie C20 is 1u but electro and all there are 1n for film.

Other than the markings on the PCB how would you know that 'this' 1u is a film cap but all the others are electro even though both are 1u?
The electro spaces usually have a square eyelet and a round eyelet, and a circular outline and a + - polarity marking. Some pcbs have a bipolar cap with a circular pcb outline. Generally, if you have a box outline, it will be a poly box or film cap (63v or 100v rating are generally good) unless it is less than 1nf (e.g. 100pf, 47pf etc.) If there's a schematic, electrolytic caps have a distinctive -I(- or -)I- marking as opposed to a non polarised cap which looks like -II- on the schematic. Please excuse me if these are things you already know.
 
Thanks! for more clarification. I just never knew you could have different types with the same value. I had just never saw a uf in a box film.
 
Mine are blue, I hope they sound ok! I used to think that MLCC stood for Multi Layer Chip Capacitor, but it's actually Multi Layer Ceramic Capacitor.
A couple things to note about MLCCs:
- MLCCs are good in switching power supplies and high-speed digital circuits where performance at megahertz frequencies is important. They are not particularly well suited for audio circuits.
- MLCCs rated for <100V have reliability issues because the ceramic layers are so thin that they can develop shorts.

For my first Arachnid (Octagon) build, I followed the BOM. The ones I got from DigiKey (FK24X7S2A105K) are rated for 100V. Next time around, I'll use film for all of the ones in the audio path.
1UF 50V MULTILAYER MONOLITHIC CERAMIC CAPACITOR

Is this the same thing?
 
Yes. Often times nowadays they will use MLCC as a designation for SMD ceramic capacitors and Monolithic as through hole versions. Just don’t get monolithic and tantalum caps confused as tantalum are polarized!
 
I don't recall anyone having problems using MLCC caps in audio circuits. I haven't had any issues with them.
 
For sure ceramic caps have the potential to color the sound. Some pedal builders use them for that very purpose. Me, I want my capacitors to be as transparent as possible. It's really a matter of personal taste. The reliability issue for ceramic caps rated <100V is real. It may only affect a small percentage of the parts, but I've seen cross-sections of caps where the metal layers grew whiskers thru the ceramic dielectric.
 
I know there are plenty of discussions about why ceramics shouldn't be used in the audio path, with all sorts of fancy simulations and frequency-vs-dc bias graphs, etc etc... but the majority of the SMD boards I'm seeing in the past two years are almost 100% ceramics.

There are still some that use through-hole or SMD film, but those are becoming more and more rare.

Disclaimer: Call me hardheaded... I'm just not a fan of simulations. They have their application, but the number of threads that have been derailed because a simulation "proved" that a schematic couldn't possibly be accurate, only to find out that it was, just discourages me from sim discussions.
 
Back
Top