SOLVED Gain Pot (Knob) Does Nothing

I decided to build the Virgil today. (Bad monkey! Bad!) Everything works fine other than the gain knob, which does nothing. What I have currently is a limited EQ pedal. Level, low, and high pots all work, but the gain does nothing. The sound is clear and clean.
I resoldered that section of the board to make sure there was good connection. The gain section still does nothing.
I also replaced IC2 with a new JRC4580. Same issue.
(I get the same results inside and outside the enclosure.)

Using a DMM, I checked the gain section of IC-2 (pins 1 and 2).

The resistance (unpowered) between pins 1 and 2 is 9k94

The voltage reading (powered) for:
Pin 1: 5.37 v
Pin 2: 5.32 v

I have no idea if those numbers are correct.

Side note: I noticed that the unit's power draw is 33 mA, which seems to be high.
 

Attachments

  • 20241113_170349.jpg
    20241113_170349.jpg
    735.8 KB · Views: 10
  • 20241113_170405.jpg
    20241113_170405.jpg
    556.5 KB · Views: 11
  • 20241113_170926.jpg
    20241113_170926.jpg
    534.7 KB · Views: 5
  • 20241113_170942.jpg
    20241113_170942.jpg
    529.7 KB · Views: 5
  • 20241113_171058.jpg
    20241113_171058.jpg
    542 KB · Views: 4
  • 20241113_172608.jpg
    20241113_172608.jpg
    593 KB · Views: 10
swap the 4580 for something else like a 4558 and see what happens.

almost everyone that has built one of these with 4580 has had issues.

 
swap the 4580 for something else like a 4558 and see what happens.

almost everyone that has built one of these with 4580 has had issues.

Holy moly, it worked! Thanks, bro! I was wracking my brain trying to figure out what I'd missed.
 
ballsy move writing digitech right on it
Yeah, I know. I don't plan on selling it or anything. After a couple hundred builds, I became concerned that I'd eventually start forgetting what some of the pedals were based on. You've been at this longer than me, though. Is that something I could get prosecuted for, Nostradoomus?
 
damn that's a cool print.

wish i had a clue about that stuff 😓
It took a lot of practice. I use a Word doc. I insert a picture of the drill template from the build guide, then put a rectangle with rounded corners over it. The rectangle's dimensions are 2.44" (W) x 4.64" (H). Then I insert text boxes for each of the knob labels. Next, I insert an image (sometimes drawn, sometimes downloaded, sometimes AI generated). I right-click and send the picture to the back, then right-click and bring it forward so it's in front of the drill template. From there, it's just adjusting the position of the picture and changing fonts. Finally, I print it on glossy photo paper. I use an inkjet printer, and it seems to work fine (versus an inkjet). Oh! I lightly spray the print with my wife's hairspray. LOL! Hairspray acts as the perfect protective lacquer. I let it sit for 24 hours so it dries thoroughly.
 
Yeah, I know. I don't plan on selling it or anything. After a couple hundred builds, I became concerned that I'd eventually start forgetting what some of the pedals were based on. ...


That's why some people use something similar, like if the pedal is called "2000lb Bee", they'll call their pedal the "Heavy Wasp" — all the DIY PCB suppliers are already doing it, for the most part*. Everybody has a clone of the TS-808, for example, commercial pedals and DIY suppliers alike, so the good names get used up pretty fast...

Of course, I'm not telling you anything you didn't already know.


Here's the reason behind my post, a suggestion:
Name your builds whatever you want, can be completely unrelated to the original pedal it's based on — then with a permanent-ink pen/marker or a paint-pen, jot down the original name on the front vertical face, the back (partially hidden under the top-jacks), inside on the lid — whatever/wherever your preference.

Again, I offer nothing new, just a reminder of what could be done.


ASIDE: What is with this circuit? Robert is a stickler for PPCB's accurate reproduction of a circuit, so the original BMs must've had the 4580 — so why does the commercial version work with the 4580, but not the Virgil? I don't recall there being a successful 4580-Virgil yet.
🤷‍♂️
👖


Your pedal...
Great graphic, very-good-looking pedal.
Thanks, too, for sharing your graphics method. My builds need graphics, so I'll give your method a crack.









*Only just now, did I look up "Virgil the monkey" — I didn't even know there was a show called Muppets Tonight ! If that's even what the obscure Virgil reference is making the connection to the Bad Monkey...
Hmm maybe I'll name my build "The DODgee Monkeh!" GRAPHIC: Ed Roth style...Have a Green Monkey in a monk's robe (instead of Ratfink) driving a classic Dodge convertible, something like this:


2c8b50920f3a5d2925e41209d4854233.jpg
 
If that's even what the obscure Virgil reference is making the connection to the Bad Monkey...


ASIDE: What is with this circuit? Robert is a stickler for PPCB's accurate reproduction of a circuit, so the original BMs must've had the 4580 — so why does the commercial version work with the 4580, but not the Virgil? I don't recall there being a successful 4580-Virgil yet.

Your guess is as good as mine... I need to build another one so I can play around with it a bit more.

The only thing I can think of is some sort of parasitic oscillation that the 4580 doesn't like. It's not a particularly high gain circuit nor is the layout overly crowded, so it's puzzling for sure.
 
Last edited:
Oh right. I DO remember the Project X reference now, mentioned elsewhere on the forum. Never saw the movie, though, so I guess that's why I forgot the reference.

Maybe the BM you got to trace was an aberration ... nope — all gutshots on the web I can find clear enough to show the chip show 4580.
Maybe Digitech craftily relabelled all their 4558s going into their BMs, to thwart the cloners... It's a con's piracy Italia.




Aside from that: Why does searching "Virgil the Monkey" link to Muppets Tonight host "Clifford"?
Still... doesn't "Virgil" nee "Clifford" remind you a bit of Tim Minchin❓

Clifford muppet.webp
9da83fb9d400b242d26e05dc24f757ca.jpg


Coincidence⁉️ I THINK NOT‼️
 
Back
Top