Super Stevie

I just finished this one too! I gave it a go based on this thread. I like it a lot. Cleans up nicely when rolling back the guitar volume. Feels like it could be a good always on pedal too.

stevie_front.jpg stevie_guts.jpg
 
Has anyone built the "High Gain" or "Flat EQ" version of this pedal? I like the normal version so much I'm thinking about building this alternate version if it's worth it.

Also, I am just a solder by numbers guy so forgive me if this is obvious, but in this circuit D100 is listed as 1N4148 which seems uncommon. I believe this is just a circuit protection diode which in most every other PedalPCB circuit has been 1N5817. If I'm assuming correctly is there any advantage to using 1N4148 in this build? I used 1N5817 because I was probably on autopilot and didn't think about it. I suspect it shouldn't matter so long as there is a diode in the right direction in that spot but I'd be curious to know more.
 
Has anyone built the "High Gain" or "Flat EQ" version of this pedal? I like the normal version so much I'm thinking about building this alternate version if it's worth it.

Also, I am just a solder by numbers guy so forgive me if this is obvious, but in this circuit D100 is listed as 1N4148 which seems uncommon. I believe this is just a circuit protection diode which in most every other PedalPCB circuit has been 1N5817. If I'm assuming correctly is there any advantage to using 1N4148 in this build? I used 1N5817 because I was probably on autopilot and didn't think about it. I suspect it shouldn't matter so long as there is a diode in the right direction in that spot but I'd be curious to know more.
Yes, Do you run out of Gain with the stock build.
The only real difference is the Gain pot value!
 
I believe this is just a circuit protection diode which in most every other PedalPCB circuit has been 1N5817.

It's fine... 1N4148 is what was in the original but it really won't make a difference... It was probably used because it's cheaper and the circuit already had four so it simplified the BOM and kept the ball rolling when building in batches.

1N5817 is used in most of the circuits here because it has a slightly lower forward voltage drop but functionally they serve the same purpose and won't like make any audible difference.
 
Yes, Do you run out of Gain with the stock build.
The only real difference is the Gain pot value!
I definitely treat the stock version as a low gain pedal and it's fantastic for that. That's how I use it so I wouldn't say I'm running out of gain, just wondering if it would also make a great high gain pedal too? Is it highER gain or "High" gain? Would I get all the range of the current pedal plus some more gain?

I'll probably just make a second build instead of changing the one I already built. If I don't like it, it's an easy fix back to stock. I'm sure I'd find a use for!
 
It's fine... 1N4148 is what was in the original but it really won't make a difference... It was probably used because it's cheaper and the circuit already had four so it simplified the BOM and kept the ball rolling when building in batches.

1N5817 is used in most of the circuits here because it has a slightly lower forward voltage drop but functionally they serve the same purpose and won't like make any audible difference.
Awesome thanks for the answer. I figured it was something more related to simplifying production. That said, on all builds I should be able to use most any Diode in that spot with no issues? Like a 1N4001 or 1N4002?
 
It's fine... 1N4148 is what was in the original but it really won't make a difference... It was probably used because it's cheaper and the circuit already had four so it simplified the BOM and kept the ball rolling when building in batches.

1N5817 is used in most of the circuits here because it has a slightly lower forward voltage drop but functionally they serve the same purpose and won't like make any audible difference.
Hey Robert, just curious on the Super Stevie pedal. Only difference I'm seeing is a different pot value and the exclusion of R6 to make it "high gain". I'm in the process of starting this build and wondered if I could simply use the "High Gain" version's 1m pot and add an on/on switch with the 3k3 resistor on one leg and the second jumpered straight through to have both versions in one pedal?
 
Hey Robert, just curious on the Super Stevie pedal. Only difference I'm seeing is a different pot value and the exclusion of R6 to make it "high gain". I'm in the process of starting this build and wondered if I could simply use the "High Gain" version's 1m pot and add an on/on switch with the 3k3 resistor on one leg and the second jumpered straight through to have both versions in one pedal?
I have an Original High Gain & built the 500K version & the only difference to me is one is higher gain! YMMV.
Because I have an Original, I changed Volume Pot B10K as it is unity at 9 to 10.00 O'clock.
With A10K, it is more like 1.00 Oclock, just past 1/2 way!. Just a smoother progression.
 
I have an Original High Gain & built the 500K version & the only difference to me is one is higher gain! YMMV.
Because I have an Original, I changed Volume Pot B10K as it is unity at 9 to 10.00 O'clock.
With A10K, it is more like 1.00 Oclock, just past 1/2 way!. Just a smoother progression.
Good to know. I guess I was asking more along the lines because I like being able to flip a switch and get two different sounds on the fly if I'm messing around... I was thinking in terms of an on/on switch, push button, etc...
I have a b.b clone from Blammo! called the bluesblaster and it switches to an LED and turns the BluesBreaker into a "Shredmaster"...
 
Back
Top