PB blaster.Obviously. I also don't have a vise. The pot broke off but the nuts are rusted together and are now spinning in the plate but I can't pry them off.
If that doesn't work, cutoff on a Dremel through the nut.
PB blaster.Obviously. I also don't have a vise. The pot broke off but the nuts are rusted together and are now spinning in the plate but I can't pry them off.
Love rivnuts. I actually just ordered a handful more end pieces on Ali today to accompany my Doyle. Will have M3-M12 and queens units.I have a new design for an enclosure and these are vital to its construction. I’m going to start redesigning my “wedge” enclosures for more structural rigidity.
I have some really cool ideas so let’s see what happens!
View attachment 57836
Man youre a life saver! I really appreciate it, the rivet nut setter came with a mix of different sized rivnuts. I have a project where i think ill be using the M6 or M8 rivnuts so i can mount allen wrench style bolts!Love rivnuts. I actually just ordered a handful more end pieces on Ali today to accompany my Doyle. Will have M3-M12 and queens units.
Now, if only pcb makers would add mounting holes.
If you find you need rivnuts or rivets, they're super cheap over there. Especially if you know what size and aren't buying a kit. I found the end pieces, not sure technical term, nut spline, nut crusher? For $2-2.50 each shipped free.
Yeah. That's the word!Are you you talking about the mandrel?
Yeah I will be buying a spare for sure! I would imagine the threading can get worn after quite a bit of use.Yeah. That's the word!
Here's the listing I bought from.
Was the cheapest I could find that had M3 and M4 both in stock.
If you know you'll be beating the M6/8 mandrel, probably good to have a spare.
If you're not in the know, "choice" listings come with free "fast"(12 business day) shipping after a minimum amount is reached, usually $10-15, regardless of seller.
Typically seem to see it in 2 weeks. Sometimes 10 days, sometimes 20.
I have several friends who've tried to use various inexpensive solutions, as I've also done a few times in the past. We all learned a lot, at least.I've been hacking some cheap Amazon TPA3255 boards lately. In theory one chip ought to be able to put 600W mono into 2 ohms, or 2x300W stereo/4Ohms. My experience has been very different. They've been tripping into protection mode way, way prematurely. I thought the chips were bogus, put in Mouser parts, same thing. Scratching my head big time. Either a circuit layout issue (doesn't look like it), or something really really weird that's been eluding me.
Im trying to design it in such a way that the walls will hold the enclosure together. Hopefully a few strategic rivets and L brackets should do the trick!Tricky but seems to be doable with proper bending sequence![]()
That’s a neat concept! Some extra work with the brackets and riv-nuts, but you eliminate most of the possible sources of bend error by keeping all your bends lines parallel. I bet you’ll be able to get the gaps pretty dead flush. And by cutting it in 4 pieces you should be able to lay it out in a pretty material-efficient way. You got something big in the works circuit-wise?Ok Im going to leave you guys alone after this I promise...
But here she is now just imagine the walls will be holding the enclosure together, again with L brackets. I want to use allen wrench bolts for a raw look since they will be exposed on the sides.....
View attachment 58023
Thank you man! My biggest worry with the last design was structural rigidity. I started looking at how some other builders that make enclosures make theirs. I started to notice that some kind of flap was incorporated but i realized a lot of that can only be achieved with a box break. So I figured this would be the next best solution. It kind of defeated those limitations I was having with my break. Plus I think on the artistic side of things those raw rivets sitting on top of the powder coated top and bottom will look great!That’s a neat concept! Some extra work with the brackets and riv-nuts, but you eliminate most of the possible sources of bend error by keeping all your bends lines parallel. I bet you’ll be able to get the gaps pretty dead flush. And by cutting it in 4 pieces you should be able to lay it out in a pretty material-efficient way. You got something big in the works circuit-wise?
A worthy circuit for an extra fancy box.As for the circuit, Ive been sitting on the normal sized Equilux that @Robert has here at the store! Ive had it for a year so i think its time to get on it!
I was planning on mounting the jacks to the angled portion right before the back wall. The reason here is so the jacks would be (somewhat) parallel to the circuit. In my last design the jack are not which doesnt allow for the some of the larger 125B projects to fit in there. It was something i saw as a design flaw and so i wanted to correct it for this new design. At least I feel this way the jacks dont look they're going to intercept the circuit! its going to be a 4 piece design.....Your design is a bit demanding when it comes to bending accuracy, dimensioning, etc. Also - are you going to mount dc and audio jacks on the rear wall. If so, how are you going to hold the jacks while tightening the nuts?
Ahhh I know so! Ive been wanting that circuit ever since I found out about it! Its going to be in the personal collection for sure!A worthy circuit for an extra fancy box.