I think that there's a bit of a disconnect between how you're thinking about pedals/components and how I (and likely many others) think about them. I'll try to explain.
I really don't think that this is necessary true. You need to understand how germanium diodes are generally used in pedals. For the most part, they are used either as (1) hard clipping diodes wired from signal to ground, or (2) to bias a leaky germanium transistor. These diodes were not designed with the intention of creating hard clipping, so why should they sound "better" than other diodes? What does "better" even mean? In the case of biasing a leaky germanium transistor, the only thing that really matters is how leaky the diode is relative to the transistor. So again, why should the Western Electric one sound "better" in this context?
This is completely incorrect, and even if it was correct, it's irrelevant. Western Electric was not a state-owned enterprise. It was a highly profitable subsidiary of AT&T, one of the most profitable monopolies of the 20th century. Western Electric absolutely had a profit motive, and it made vast profits. That's irrelevant, of course. Essentially every supplier that we use for building pedals has/had a profit motive, with the exception of some NOS germanium components made by state-owned enterprises in communist countries.
Not sure that this is the route I'd take here. The audiophile scene is all too well-known for having a significant number of people with too much money, not enough sense, and a deep appreciation for snake oil. The sort of people who claim to be able to hear the difference between a power cable with "natural rubber" insulation and one with synthetic insulation but can't tell the difference between a 320kbps MP3 and a vinyl record in a blind A/B test. Just because audiophiles will spend "crazy bucks" on some NOS components doesn't mean that a different NOS component from the same manufacturer will sound any "better" in a pedal than a more robust and modern version.
You're really missing the point on this. You can get a D9 or D18 germanium diode for about 15 cents. You have not provided any reason why people should pay 30x more for a component that does the same thing. The relevant price comparison here isn't a sandwich, it's another germanium diode.
What kind of circuit did you build? And how did you compare its performance to the same circuit using an ordinary, non-magic germanium diode?
You seem to really dislike "crapola glass-seal" germanium diodes for some reason. We've been using those in pedals since the 60s, and I'm not aware of any issues with them failing due to their "crapola glass-seal." I've used dozens of them in pedals, and had no issues them failing or breaking during assembly or use.
Then how do you know that they "perform easily as good as a crapola glass-seal IN type diode"? You don't seem to understand how or why germanium diodes are used in a pedal, but you seem comfortable declaring that your magic diodes "perform easily as good as a crapola glass-seal [diode]." There's a disconnect there.
Yes, NOS Sylvania and Soviet diodes are cheap. So what? So are 1/4 watt 1% metal film resistors. So are 1N4148s. So are many other components that we use. They're cheap and do the job without any problems. You seem to think that's a problem for some reason. The onus is on you to explain why people should stop using the cheap, functional component that they've used for decades and switch to your special magic component that costs 30x more than the one they're using today.
I'm sure that you can find outliers, but it's really easy to find them for 15-30¢ per diode.
Again, you are the one who needs to explain why your expensive component is superior. You haven't come close to doing that. And your posts sound like a snake oil salesman, which doesn't help.
Really? Because that's 100% how you're coming across.
Like I said, stuff like this makes you sound like an asshole. Telling people "if you like stuff that's cheaper than my magic diodes, then you don't care about anything other than the decoration on your packaging" is not going to win you any friends. It's also some of the worst logical reasoning that I've ever heard. "If a 34¢ component works perfectly, therefore the paint on the pedal enclosure is the only thing that matters." Utterly bizarre.
If you understood how and why germanium diodes are used in pedals, then you would never have written this.
Your comments reveal a profound lack of understanding of how guitar pedals use germanium diodes. This would be fine, if you weren't aggressively telling people who do understand how they work that they're ignorant cheapskates. You keep making vague, puffery-ridden claims about something that you want to sell, and then rudely insult anyone who questions you.
Hmm, well. I did not mean to offend anyone.
I did get defensive on the point of me trying to make money on here somehow, apologies.
I apologize to everyone if I came off like an asshole. I am actually just excited to see someone do a build with these..and what I see out there is sorta boring. I really do not mean you suck or anyone else. Snd don't mean this in a denigrating way.
I mean.. if you work magic with cheap parts... it's still made of cheap parts. If you use expensive diodes, you can then say your units have those... Nevermind these.. I'll settle for someone just using branded ones.. (I am sure someone does)
That's OK to make great spamburgers, but it is a factor in final intrinsic value... (paper money vs gold argument).
But, unless you know these expensive diodes are worse. Otherwise... I don't get the vitriol about the potential of $5 diodes..
If you can sell a pedal for $200, and you can spend $15 more on even a better brand of non-Generic diodes... that might be worthwhile experiment for someone, especially if you like them, and you can market that. .
I don't see the difference in paying for my next sandwich and another diode.. sorry... 0.30 is just cheap... so is $5x3. Even if it's just an image thing.
The construction of these WE's is vastly different. despite similar electrical applications.... even you have to agree on that (?) I am suggesting that this sort of diode could make a pedal.. possibly sound better... maybe look better (at least I think so)... and at very, very least.. be much different than anyone else. Being different is a key factor, in many cool products. I am always bummed to see the cool paint job and all the same parts under the hood.
You are saying I am a layman... so I will make another laymen's observation: All of the pedals I see on the market are using the same unbranded, mysterious glass diodes... which looks great for consistency, and really boring too, in fact, it's the lowest common denominator -- that's the only point I was trying to make. I like to see inside, as well as outside.. many of us audio geeks do.
.
I was after either interest... or proof of concept on freebies. Unless you have tried these. You just don't know. You are saying basically, diodes are switches.. so you just want cheap switches; OK. But, I say, if it's in the signal path, it likely does matter on some level. Furthermore, I see different behavior on the scope.. so it will matter some (for clipping at least). We just don't know how it will sound.
Logical, right?
I seem to have offended some folks here as I don't build pedals to sell. No, I don't. But I work with cool parts that are used for pedals and could be saved from the landfill. And I sell to boutique amp builders and studios, and hobbyists everywhere.. as well as builders of other devices who need high quality stuff, no longer made -- I hear stuff, I see stuff... and I see really unexpected things that actually matter.
When people asked if I was selling, I said no.. as to not contaminate research with sales.
I offered samples for people to try, if they wanted to report back. How is that puffery, or mean / insulting?
NOS Sylvania and Soviet diodes are cheap. So what?
Raw materials, workmanship, and basic economics gives me prejudice..yes.
But... I'm sorry. Actually have nothing horrible to say about the glass seal diodes.. except that everyone calls them NOS from suspect sources. And, no one wants to try something different. What about the old pedals?... I've attached a photo of the original glass seal IN34, which honestly looks, not much like the 0.30 units -- sure maybe it's worse.. but it looks better.
(Actually writing this, I just noticed, the original IN34 is point contact.. are you using "point contact" IN34's and were they ever using in the classic pedals? )
The source of so-called NOS diodes I find often suspect on eBay. But I'm sure you guys knew where to get the good ones.
Everyone says they're the same (I doubt it, they don't even measure all that consistent, really, not the ones I've tried) -- and the worst is that plenty filter in from China and Russia and are sold as something great, or at least I thought.
I would argue that you are defending the $.30 diode just as hard as I was unintentionally denigrating it (sorry) .
I'm not all talk and puffery . I'm interested in getting to the heart of the matter, actually..
And I can tell you from my past 35 years of experience is people don't pay a lot for stuff for zero reason, not most of the time.
Snake oil is surprisingly somewhat rare..
Sure, it's out there, but snake oil usually doesn't come in a dirty, filthy box of hand-clipped diodes like I have.
Please refer to the blow apart diagram of the WE 400 and compare to a blow apart diagram of the mystery glass seal.
I tried to share the specs here from my library. I don't see how that is puffery.
Yes...
My test involved looking at the Hard-clipping behavior , which I thought was the most important application of a diode in a pedal that would affect tone .... (am I wrong?) . How do you think this matters?
I will study and read up on the use of Germanium diodes for leakage. I have not been looking at that.
My experiment compared one of these to another germanium diode and observed via oscilloscope that they did in fact have a nicer, softer shoulder (which is documented all over the place). The clipping action compared to the other germanium IN34 diode I checked looked allot different.. maybe thats good maybe that's bad -- I was really up front about that (again puffery?)
This might have been because of the higher Forward Voltage, that would make sense, and I assume that leads into the adice of checking IV curve.
So far, no one has quoted or speculated on the spec sheet in my photo versus an IN34.
The breakdown voltage, leakage specs and forward voltage specifications are also somewhat superior (or different) to the IN34 if you check out the spec sheet in my photo, . Not saying this is going to matter, but it's there and is just another facet of why these did cost more (probably $3ish back in early 60s).
The practice of biasing a leaky resistor with a diode I did not try. Is this something that came about after the original applications of germanium diodes in vintage pedals?
I do primarily deal with audiophile markets, but you really have to realize that they are careful listeners. And you're coming from a field in which people are literally listening to noise and then making totally subjective decisions about what they like or don't like,. I'm not criticizing that. I totally get it. But I don't think it's anything superior to what audiophiles do.. I also think there is a bridge and commonality to the two practices.
There are cheapskate audiophiles too. I recommend cheap items all the time. But cheap to us is under $50 (?)
One area that I promise you you are a bit wrong about is the Western Electric's profit motive. While you are right, they made tons of money on the telephone business and maybe some selling to the military ---You're slightly confusing the two companies. Western Electric was the manufacturing arm of AT&T, and they sold specialty audio devices to the government by this time... and also used it themselves for audio transmission. They cared deeply about reliability.. and their mfr standards and tolerances, were generally higher than the average modern Chinese factory. I have attached a price list of some other diodes they sold. This is not the $100 hammer argument. These diodes were probably gold plated for aerospace, at least some of them. what I am saying that really cared about raw materials.
Most of these cost $3 in the early 60s. Inflation adjusted that is $30 in today's money. while that's not an outrageous sum, it sure as heck pays for a (potentially) superior diode. High prices, yes.. but they did not sell these at radio shack. It was for national defense and it was a government granted monopoly, basically as you said.. for electronic parts as well.
If you take a look at my picture, you will see that it says right at the top of the book, not sold to general public. They only sold to the government and institutions by the 1960s... you could not purchase a Germanium transistor or part over the counter..that's not only low profit motive... that isn't even capitalism.
I have also attached a price list.. unfortunately, I have not located on for the 400F.. but look at the prices.. this was 1963.
Before that, Bell Labs invented most of what we now use in audio, including pioneering in the cinema and early high-fidelity audio business.
I never called anyone an ignorant cheapskate. Your words not mine.
And did I insult someone who want to buy some?
Most do not, and I did not want to break rules.
""Like I said, stuff like this makes you sound like an asshole. Telling people "if you like stuff that's cheaper than my magic diodes, then you don't care about anything other than the decoration on your packaging" is not going to win you any friends. It's also some of the worst logical reasoning that I've ever heard. "If a 34¢ component works perfectly, therefore the paint on the pedal enclosure is the only thing that matters." Utterly bizarre.""
Sorry if I touched anyones nerve. What I am noticing..(or feeling).. since everybody is using only generic 0.30 ones, you are locking yourself into looking like everyone else..or maybe you don't want to try different things... I get that. but, that's also how corn syrup went into the Welches Grape Jelly (cause... it's "just as good as sugar") There I go with the food analogies again... dammit.