Powersound Boost vs Powersound Overdrive
- Thread starter MichaelW
- Start date
Harry Klippton
Well-known member
You know you're gonna build both! 
MichaelW
Well-known member
You guys are getting to know me too well.....it's scary.....You know you're gonna build both!
Harry Klippton
Well-known member
Tell ya what, you build both and then let me know which one I should build
Harry Klippton
Well-known member
Why wait for the coupon when they'll be sold out? Buy now and beat the rush. It's payday after all
MichaelW
Well-known member
I have to continue the illusion that I'm "saving money DIY....." at least for my wife........
I built the overdrive without the charge pump, but I don’t have the boost. I assumed I wanted the volume knob, and that the circuits were otherwise the same. I can’t remember if that is correct or not.
I definitely recommend the overdrive. It’s fun on its own, in front of a muff, and behind a muff. Balancing the gain and volume can make a bunch of useful sounds.
I definitely recommend the overdrive. It’s fun on its own, in front of a muff, and behind a muff. Balancing the gain and volume can make a bunch of useful sounds.
Coda
Well-known member
I have the one that use to be the only one around here. As it was explained to me, Overdriver mode was the gain maxed and the Vol where it needs to be, and power boost mode was volume maxed and gain where it could be (I used "could" instead of "needs" because its flippin loud). I personally believe that the Overdriver is more practical, which is the reason it originally came out, I believe...
Also, paging @Big Monk ...
Also, paging @Big Monk ...
Robert
Reverse Engineer
The boost is loud as hell. It starts at above unity with the volume knob all the way down.
Unless you're goosing a cranked amp I'd personally go with the overdrive.
You'll probably want to use a lower value pot for Gain.... I spec'd it like the original schematic on the PCB, but it doesn't do much until the very top end of rotation then goes from clean to distorted in an almost uncomfortable fraction of rotation. (My understanding is that this is normal behavior for the original)
I believe C1K is a popular choice. I didn't have a C-taper when I built the prototype but B1K improved it quite a bit. C is probably the way to go.
Unless you're goosing a cranked amp I'd personally go with the overdrive.
You'll probably want to use a lower value pot for Gain.... I spec'd it like the original schematic on the PCB, but it doesn't do much until the very top end of rotation then goes from clean to distorted in an almost uncomfortable fraction of rotation. (My understanding is that this is normal behavior for the original)
I believe C1K is a popular choice. I didn't have a C-taper when I built the prototype but B1K improved it quite a bit. C is probably the way to go.
Coda
Well-known member
But that's part of the charm! No one buys a Les Paul if they want a properly intonated G string...
Robert
Reverse Engineer
And that is why I left it as spec'd in the original schematic. I agree 100%, sometimes the quirks are what makes things what they are.
Gilmour used the Power Boost in conjunction with a Volume pedal.
I would build the Power Overdrive unless your using a Volume pedal or your Tweaking the Volume knob while your Soloing!
Harry Klippton
Well-known member
We're talking about volume pedals in this thread today
