I forget where I read it - maybe it was here! - but apparently the reason Paul C made the VREF voltage splitters asymmetrical was to help guys using batteries which were running low on voltage.
I forget where I read it - maybe it was here! - but apparently the reason Paul C made the VREF voltage splitters asymmetrical was to help guys using batteries which were running low on voltage.
I forget where I read it - maybe it was here! - but apparently the reason Paul C made the VREF voltage splitters asymmetrical was to help guys using batteries which were running low on voltage.
Isn't the net effect of R9 to essentially half the treble pot value? IOW, in the newer schematic, could you drop R9 and use a C250k pot (or in the older schematic, drop R9 and use a C50k)?