Aion Cygnus (Cornish G-2) Low Volume

Fingolfen

Well-known member
So I finished up an AionFX Cygnus (Cornish G-2), and the pedal sounds good, as long as I have the volume at or near full and the sustain is at least half way up. I contrast that to an Effects Layout P-2 I built where if I don't turn the volume down to around 9:00 or 10:00 I'll blow people out of the room - even on my practice amp.

I've back traced the circuit, and I can't find any dead transistors, etc. For the build I hand selected 1N34A diodes with a forward voltage >0.3V (most were in the 0.34-0.35V range). As such I stuck with the original 15K value for R18 and 680R for R19. I'm wondering if I should have gone with the increased gain on the pre-diode stage using 18K for R18 and 100R for R19.

Has anyone tried this both ways??? Thoughts? I may try subbing out the resistors (though de-soldering on a double sided board is such a PITA).
 
That's a good thought... I didn't test the off-state leakage of the diodes, just the forward voltage as I'd used these diodes (1N34A) in several builds without issue. What would be the easiest way to test it now that the diodes are in the circuit???
 
That's a good thought... I didn't test the off-state leakage of the diodes, just the forward voltage as I'd used these diodes (1N34A) in several builds without issue. What would be the easiest way to test it now that the diodes are in the circuit???
The least invasive way would be to test other diodes in the bunch to get a general idea—but that won’t tell you about the ones in-circuit. To get an accurate reading, you will need to desolder one lead to ensure you’re not getting an errant reading.

Edit: You’ll need to remove them and test them as described in the linked post. The circuit discussed there is very similar to the G2 (i.e., modified BMP).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fig
The least invasive way would be to test other diodes in the bunch to get a general idea—but that won’t tell you about the ones in-circuit. To get an accurate reading, you will need to desolder one lead to ensure you’re not getting an errant reading.

Edit: You’ll need to remove them and test them as described in the linked post. The circuit discussed there is very similar to the G2 (i.e., modified BMP).
Yeah.... that's what I was sort of afraid of... :D

Looking at the table in the file, the 1N34As he tested were all fairly leaky, and now I think I know why any G2 demo I've seen has the volume cranked to at least 8....
 
1n34A is a rather generic part number made for many years by many manufacturers. That table is not intended to be a definitive reference resource—just a collection of data points. To be sure about any specific device, you'll need to test it. The G2 can certainly behave like a BMP with Si diodes (albeit with a different compression and lower output due to the lower Vf of the diodes), but the Ge diodes must be appropriate for the circuit in order for it to work as intended. When Ge diodes are shunted to GND for hard clipping, this isn't a concern. Here, though, the resistance has an appreciable impact on the gain of that stage.
 
1n34A is a rather generic part number made for many years by many manufacturers. That table is not intended to be a definitive reference resource—just a collection of data points. To be sure about any specific device, you'll need to test it. The G2 can certainly behave like a BMP with Si diodes (albeit with a different compression and lower output due to the lower Vf of the diodes), but the Ge diodes must be appropriate for the circuit in order for it to work as intended. When Ge diodes are shunted to GND for hard clipping, this isn't a concern. Here, though, the resistance has an appreciable impact on the gain of that stage.

So I pulled out several additional diodes from the set I used for the build... you nailed it... leakage is terrible. I found some 1N270s with very low leakage, but the forward voltage was low, so I had to change R18 and R19 to 18K and 100R from the original 15K and 680R spec... thing absolutely howls now. It sounds like a muff, but with more low tones... I honestly like it a lot. It's a bit to the dark side.
 
I like Schottky: find one that has a similar [edit: forward-]voltage to whatever Ge you have in place, and replace.

Schottky are stable, don't drift with temperature changes.

Sound? That's in the ear of the beerholder.

people-using-respirators-and-ear-horns-during-speech.jpg
 
Last edited:
So I finished up an AionFX Cygnus (Cornish G-2), and the pedal sounds good, as long as I have the volume at or near full and the sustain is at least half way up. I contrast that to an Effects Layout P-2 I built where if I don't turn the volume down to around 9:00 or 10:00 I'll blow people out of the room - even on my practice amp.

I've back traced the circuit, and I can't find any dead transistors, etc. For the build I hand selected 1N34A diodes with a forward voltage >0.3V (most were in the 0.34-0.35V range). As such I stuck with the original 15K value for R18 and 680R for R19. I'm wondering if I should have gone with the increased gain on the pre-diode stage using 18K for R18 and 100R for R19.

Has anyone tried this both ways??? Thoughts? I may try subbing out the resistors (though de-soldering on a double sided board is such a PITA).
Does EffectsLayout still offer the P2? Don’t see it in the shop? Thanks.
 
Does EffectsLayout still offer the P2? Don’t see it in the shop? Thanks.
They don't have the board anymore, though you can find the layout. However the EL P-2 is not accurate... both PedalPCB and AionFX now offer accurate P-2 boards. I've only built the PedalPCB one... and I love it... I've built a few at this point...
 
They don't have the board anymore, though you can find the layout. However the EL P-2 is not accurate... both PedalPCB and AionFX now offer accurate P-2 boards. I've only built the PedalPCB one... and I love it... I've built a few at this point...
I believe guitarpcb.com still has one.
 
Back
Top