Robert
Reverse Engineer
You should name it “Josh’s big mistake”.
Not the LWD-2?
Yeah, too much, you're right. We could call it the Fumble.
You should name it “Josh’s big mistake”.
I'm still for calling it the "Varna Sankar".
It essentially means "caste corruption" through the marrying of a lower caste. I married up. So the shoe fits......Yes.
Wait... we gotta make sure we're not throwing around some unknown racial slur first....![]()
![]()
Its not. Its more like calling someone a bastard, or a republican.Yes.
Wait... we gotta make sure we're not throwing around some unknown racial slur first....![]()
![]()
who really cares. He's not really got any reason to lie in a "I messed up" video... the funny thing is after years of JHS going "look at this cool pedal" and the informed bits of the internet going "it's a clone" is he pretty much is laying out how much of their stuff is tracing other stuff!At the risk of wrinkling my tin foil hat, I don't know if I believe that it was a genuine mix up. He spent a lot of time explaining a plausible scenario that led to this, but you have to ask: if the two circuits were so similar, what was the point of coming out with this in the first place? There was a big backlash of people complaining about the lack of a second footswitch and I can't help but think this was Josh's way of making a V2 of the pedal to appease these people as well as creating demand for their entire inventory of V1 kits that would otherwise be unsold in favor of the new one.
He explained their methodology of housing breadboards in their boxes with labels etc, but how does the viewer know that he didn't make that up for the video? Or any of the things he talked about without any way of verifying?
Absolutely.
This is all tongue in cheek for me. I wasn't expecting a genuine Dumble product to begin with, so the fact that there actually was something interesting in there is pretty cool.
I do think these kits would be a little more interesting if they included a schematic and at least a minimal circuit explanation.
I'll try to measure those remaining cap values today.
FWIW those archival boxes have made an appearance in a previous "That Pedal Show," I think it was something about the iterations of the Morning Glory.He explained their methodology of housing breadboards in their boxes with labels etc, but how does the viewer know that he didn't make that up for the video? Or any of the things he talked about without any way of verifying?
He was already a marketing genius before this, in my opinion. He proved it with the Tacobolt.I think it was an honest mistake. I'm not sure anyone ever wants to sell that many of a product and then reveal that what it was advertised as is not the thing it actually is. That feels way too risky to be a 4D chess move that was intentional.
If I'm wrong, he's a marketing genius because it worked.