Big Monk
Well-known member
The tariffs are charged by the shipping company are they not?
I’m not sure who the responsible parties are but I can tell you this: In the absence of clear instructions, everything is going to be worst case scenario.
The tariffs are charged by the shipping company are they not?
Consumers will spend less on "nonessential" luxury items (e.g. your/my pedals) because they already feel the squeeze on more essential goods, which are skyrocketing in price—due in part to tariffs.And at the end of the day, I pose this challenge: Name one thing, that’s not shipping, that has drastically changed about building pedals?
You shut your damn mouth sir!It almost makes sense to actually play these things instead of just building more.
I did the same thing. Loaded up on knobs and jacks.made a non enclosure order this morning. 125$ worth of knobs, hardware, caps etc. shipping dhl was just over 5$.
I did the same thing. Loaded up on knobs and jacks.
My July 28 order just shipped yesterday. They are very backed up.I'm still waiting on a Tayda order with one enclosure from late July. Are they really that backed up?
I'm going to disagree there. If a political party I normally side with announced that the thing I enjoy doing is going to cost almost twice as much for no reason, I would have some pretty strong feelings about that. I don't vote out of loyalty to a party, I vote in alignment with issues and policy. If someone I thought was great started doing things that aren't great, I would stop thinking that person was great. I can do that.But I have a feeling if this came from the other side of the aisle, we’d not have such strong sentiment against it.
We don’t have to speculate here. This policy proposal was put forth by the previous administration last summer using the same spurious claims. People were skeptical then too. There’s been a whole lot of noise in the meantime that has distracted from that.I'm going to disagree there. If a political party I normally side with announced that the thing I enjoy doing is going to cost almost twice as much for no reason, I would have some pretty strong feelings about that. I don't vote out of loyalty to a party, I vote in alignment with issues and policy. If someone I thought was great started doing things that aren't great, I would stop thinking that person was great. I can do that.
It's easy to be flippant if you are geographically or economically insulated from this, but reality is that this illegal policy will materially squash the middle American who makes an average income of just under $40K/year. When your car (that you need for work) breaks down, and you have no choice but to buy artificially inflated overseas parts (the tariff gods never considered the currently nonexistent infrastructure to manufacture them here), your kid needs braces and rent is due, there will be tough decisions to make.
I totally get this. I am off social media to avoid a lot of toxic content. At the same time it’s a bit hard to discuss the tariffs and shipping without dipping into politics from time to time…@vigilante398
I don't want anything I’m saying to come off as me supporting one side or another.
If anything, I’m apolitical when it comes to this. Things that suck, suck. And this surely sucks.
I think the thing I’m burnt out on is politics creeping into my hobby/side hustle in any way.
This is a crafty community. We are going to have to find ways to beat the tariff system. If anyone can, it’s us.
Should we even have to? Probably not but this is the hand we’ve been dealt.
I also think having all manufacturing out of the country is not a good state to be in. It’s pretty risky to be so dependent on foreign labor. And I also think that if you want to bring that kind of production back in the country you should start by investing in R&D and supporting innovation and the needs of those who want to rebuild these industries. The tariffs are not doing that and it’s unclear to me if they ever will have that effect. My opinion is that they won’t, but I don’t know enough about it to be authoritative in any way so just ignore me!We don’t have to speculate here. This policy proposal was put forth by the previous administration last summer using the same spurious claims. People were skeptical then too. There’s been a whole lot of noise in the meantime that has distracted from that.
Also, that approach wasn’t Leroy Jenkins-ing into blowing up 30+ years of global supply chain systems and trade. It’s one thing to say, “we seem to have destroyed domestic industry by essentially subsidizing overseas manufacturing and propping up the VC class, maybe this trade arrangement isn’t the best. How do we frame it in terms as NatSec?” compared to “what do those economist nerds know, I wanna make the world beg.”
EDIT: I wouldn’t have believed you if you told me I’d be defending American third-way free trade economic policies of the nineties a decade ago. The issue here isn’t the soundness of that policy set, it’s that you break a whole lot and cause a lot of damaging waves when you try to do a U-turn while sailing a tanker.
This is the best argument I've seen against using ground planes."Importers must declare the exact amount of steel, copper, and aluminum in products, with a 100% tariff applied to these materials."
Importers must declare the exact amount of steel, copper, and aluminum in products, with a 100% tariff applied to these materials.
Damn straight - check this out:I’m not sure who the responsible parties are but I can tell you this: In the absence of clear instructions, everything is going to be worst case scenario.
Call J. G. WentworthAt a later date. Sometimes you need the cash now.