Exactly.
Let's look at some cases in point.
The Federal Reserve did a very detailed analysis of Trump's aluminum tariffs from 2016-2020, looking at the impact on manufacturing and skilled American jobs. America imports a lot of aluminum from Canada. The reason why is that aluminum takes a large amount of energy to make, and Canada has a lot of low-cost hydropower - so they can make it at lower cost than we can. What the Fed analysis found was, indeed, there was a small increase in US jobs in aluminum smelting due to the tariffs. However, the Fed also found that there was a larger loss of US manufacturing jobs, because the higher aluminum prices hurt manufacturers that used aluminum as a raw material in their product - they lost sales because their product was now more expensive and less competitive against foreign producers. THE END RESULT OF THE FED's ANALYSIS WAS THAT THERE WAS A NET JOB LOSS FROM THE TRUMP'S TARIFFS. Coincidentally, it was noted that US smelters did not ramp up their production to take significant market share from foreign makers, they instead preferred to raise their prices and pocketed the higher profits.
Think about that over your coffee... Brazil, the world's largest coffee grower now faces 50% tariffs for importing coffee to the US. Yet outside of small pockets in Hawaii, the US does not have the climate to grow coffee. So the net result is much higher coffee prices, w/ no possibility of large increases in US coffee production. Oh, and now Brazil will now shift their coffee export focus to China, so that if the tariffs are ever reduced it may be tough to persuade Brazil to ship coffee again to the US...
Normally, countries take several years to make trade treaties precisely because of this point - there are a lot of important details to work through to make things work. Blanket tariffs are just a losing proposition.