Jlcpcb and tariffs

Here is my JLCPCB Order from today:

View attachment 102333

I ordered:

20 - PCBA Boards for V2 125B Electric Monktress
10 - Standard (Through Hole) V2 1590XX Electric Monktress
5 - 1590XX Vibe Prototype
100 - 3PDT Universal Bypass Boards
50 - 125B I/O Boards
25 - 1590XX I/O Boards
20 - 125B Nameplates
10 - 1590XX Nameplates
So an order sometime last year the order wouldn’t have had the “Custom duties & taxes” $56.89 line item?
 
So an order sometime last year the order wouldn’t have had the “Custom duties & taxes” $56.89 line item?

Right. That's new.

Tayda is handling it a little differently, as they don't provide a separate line item but are rolling it into shipping. Which makes sense because I imagine that is the duty they need to pay prior to shipping into the USA.
 
US consumers can pay the tariff on delivery, with an added broker's fee to the carrier, or we can pay it in advance, rolled into the shipping charges at origin, without that broker's fee.

Neither Tayda, nor Thailand, nor DHL, nor any other rhetorical straw man, is ultimately responsible for payment of the new tariffs. They offer DDP as a service, to make it easier for us as customers. It's a simple but important distinction.
 
What’s wrong with it in this case is that the supposed aim of the tariff is to encourage increased manufacturing in the US. But if you slap non-strategic tariffs on everything, you wind up including specialty items (like rugby goggles for one example) that will never plausibly be manufactured in the US due to very limited demand.
So, increased prices with no plausible benefit for the US citizen/consumer.

Exactly.

Let's look at some cases in point.

The Federal Reserve did a very detailed analysis of Trump's aluminum tariffs from 2016-2020, looking at the impact on manufacturing and skilled American jobs. America imports a lot of aluminum from Canada. The reason why is that aluminum takes a large amount of energy to make, and Canada has a lot of low-cost hydropower - so they can make it at lower cost than we can. What the Fed analysis found was, indeed, there was a small increase in US jobs in aluminum smelting due to the tariffs. However, the Fed also found that there was a larger loss of US manufacturing jobs, because the higher aluminum prices hurt manufacturers that used aluminum as a raw material in their product - they lost sales because their product was now more expensive and less competitive against foreign producers. THE END RESULT OF THE FED's ANALYSIS WAS THAT THERE WAS A NET JOB LOSS FROM TRUMP'S TARIFFS. Coincidentally, it was noted that US smelters did not ramp up their production to take significant market share from foreign makers, they instead preferred to raise their prices and pocket the higher profits.

Think about that over your coffee... Brazil, the world's largest coffee grower now faces 50% tariffs for importing coffee to the US. Yet outside of small pockets in Hawaii, the US does not have the climate to grow coffee. So the net result is much higher coffee prices, w/ no possibility of large increases in US coffee production. Oh, and now Brazil will now shift their coffee export focus to China, so that if the tariffs are ever reduced it may be tough to persuade Brazil to ship coffee again to the US...

Normally, countries take several years to make trade treaties precisely because of this point - there are a lot of important details to work through to make things work. Blanket tariffs are just a losing proposition.
 
Last edited:
Exactly.

Let's look at some cases in point.

The Federal Reserve did a very detailed analysis of Trump's aluminum tariffs from 2016-2020, looking at the impact on manufacturing and skilled American jobs. America imports a lot of aluminum from Canada. The reason why is that aluminum takes a large amount of energy to make, and Canada has a lot of low-cost hydropower - so they can make it at lower cost than we can. What the Fed analysis found was, indeed, there was a small increase in US jobs in aluminum smelting due to the tariffs. However, the Fed also found that there was a larger loss of US manufacturing jobs, because the higher aluminum prices hurt manufacturers that used aluminum as a raw material in their product - they lost sales because their product was now more expensive and less competitive against foreign producers. THE END RESULT OF THE FED's ANALYSIS WAS THAT THERE WAS A NET JOB LOSS FROM THE TRUMP'S TARIFFS. Coincidentally, it was noted that US smelters did not ramp up their production to take significant market share from foreign makers, they instead preferred to raise their prices and pocketed the higher profits.

Think about that over your coffee... Brazil, the world's largest coffee grower now faces 50% tariffs for importing coffee to the US. Yet outside of small pockets in Hawaii, the US does not have the climate to grow coffee. So the net result is much higher coffee prices, w/ no possibility of large increases in US coffee production. Oh, and now Brazil will now shift their coffee export focus to China, so that if the tariffs are ever reduced it may be tough to persuade Brazil to ship coffee again to the US...

Normally, countries take several years to make trade treaties precisely because of this point - there are a lot of important details to work through to make things work. Blanket tariffs are just a losing proposition.
Pretty sure Trump doesn’t understand how tariffs work.
 
Pretty sure Trump doesn’t understand how tariffs work.
It's all part of this weird plan; partly a shortcut to cowboy diplomacy, partly bullying world powers, posturing. Some of it's 2025, some of it may well be something on the horizon. Maybe inevitable conflict and wanting to shore up domestic whatevers. But I'm not in poly-sci. I'm---we're---looking at the short term hurt it's putting on small businesses, the strange coerced groveling of big businesses. It's all just... what was the word that got thrown around in '24? Weird. It's weird.
 
Back
Top